Skip to main content

Walk! California decriminalises jaywalking

It's been illegal for a century, but soon pedestrians in the US state will cross where they like
By Adam Hill October 13, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
From 1 January 2023, you won't need necessarily to cross here in Los Angeles (© ITS International)

Jaywalking - the act of crossing the road when not at a marked crosswalk or signalised intersection - is to be decriminalised in California, as long as pedestrians are adjudged to have done it safely.

From 1 January, pedestrians in the US state will be able to cross the street wherever they like.

The Freedom To Walk Act from California Assembly member Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) defines when an officer can stop and cite a pedestrian for jaywalking: they will only be able to do so "when a reasonably careful person would realise there is an immediate danger of a collision".

Opponents of jaywalking laws have long argued that they are used by law enforcement authorities as a pretext to harass individuals, particularly those from low-income communities or from ethnic minorities.

“It should not be a criminal offence to safely cross the street," said Ting. "When expensive tickets and unnecessary confrontations with police impact only certain communities, it’s time to reconsider how we use our law enforcement resources and whether our jaywalking laws really do protect pedestrians."

“Plus, we should be encouraging people to get out of their cars and walk for health and environmental reasons.”

Peter Norton, in his book Autonorama, makes the point that legislation to outlaw 'jaywalking' - in itself a derogatory term, since 'jay' means 'country bumpkin' - was encouraged by the nascent US auto industry in the early 20th century to switch blame for road deaths from car drivers to vulnerable road users.

Related Content

  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe
  • Does enforcement merit a place in the EU's ITS action Plan?
    February 3, 2012
    Colin Wilson, IBI Group, looks at the implications for enforcement of the European Commission's new Action Plan for the Deployment of ITS in Europe
  • Are e-scooters safe for cities?
    November 6, 2019
    Electric scooters are promoted as both a lifestyle choice and an environmentally friendly means of solving first- and last-mile challenges.
  • Data holds the key to combating VRU casualties
    May 8, 2015
    Accident analysis software can help authorities identify common causes and make best use of their budgets, as Will Baron explains. More than 1.2 million people die on the world’s roads each year and according to the World Health Organisation, half of these are pedestrians and vulnerable road users (those whose vehicle does not have a protective shell, such as motorcyclists and cyclists). While much has been done to improve road safety and cut the number of deaths and serious injuries on our roads, a great d