Skip to main content

Australia assesses 30km/h safety benefits

Trial in Yarra near Melbourne found that vehicle speeds fell and residents approved
By Ben Spencer May 6, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Australia findings give support for the likely safety benefits of the 30km/h trial (© Björn Wylezich | Dreamstime.com)

Australia's Monash University Accident Research Center has evaluated the benefits of a 30km/h speed limit trial in Yarra, near Melbourne. 

The city has a 40 km/h default speed limit, but wanted to reduce it in local residential streets.

A 'before and after' trial design was employed with a control (untreated) area to evaluate the safety outcomes. 

Speed limits were reduced in a trial area but remained at 40km/h in the control region.

Vehicle speeds were measured at around 100 selected sites in the trial and control areas, and resident surveys were undertaken in both regions before and after the trial.

In a paper available online, results show a reduction of 1.1% in average speed in the trial region but a surprising 2.7% in the control region. 

On further examination, it found significant reductions in the percent of vehicles exceeding 40km/h and 50km/h in both the treated and control regions, but not at 30km/h.

The survey results found increased support for the lower speed limit of 17% with little adverse consequences.

The findings give support for the likely safety benefits of the 30km/h trial with increased support from residents. 

According to the paper, speed reductions in the control region suggested a carry-over of the effects of the trial but also added support by local residents for reduced speed limits in the region.

Potential injury savings were estimated at a 4% reduction in the risk of a pedestrian injury from the observed treatment effect in the trial region. 
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Peter Bentley wins Max Lay Award
    October 27, 2021
    Prestigious ITS Australia gong for achievement will be presented to ITS veteran next February
  • Texas moves to prevent wrong-way drivers
    May 30, 2014
    A study has shown the extent and ramifications of wrong way driving and proposed cost-effective countermeasures. Wrong way driving collisions occur relatively infrequently but the results can be devastating. Statistics from the US National Transportation Safety Board, an independent, federal all-modes agency, reveal that wrong way (WW) driving, account for only about 3% of accidents on high-speed divided highways but are much more likely to result in fatal and serious injuries.
  • Iteris’ ClearGuide answers USDoT call on traffic fatalities
    January 17, 2022
    Jeff Venables of Iteris explains the new approach ClearGuide Speeding Analytics takes to help US agencies realise their USDoT safety initiatives as road deaths soar
  • Partially automated cars ‘provide financial and safety benefits’
    July 19, 2016
    Carnegie Mellon College of Engineering researchers in the US have concluded that the public could derive economic and social benefits today if safety-oriented, partially automated vehicle technologies were deployed in all cars. The researchers examined forward collision warning, lane departure warning and blind spot monitoring systems. These technologies can include partially autonomous braking or controls to help vehicles avoid crashes. Chris T. Hendrickson, director of the Carnegie Mellon Traffic21 In