Skip to main content

Cut vehicle access to clean up cities: report

Communication of benefits is key for acceptance of LEZ deployment, says EIT Urban Mobility
By Adam Hill October 17, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
London combines congestion charge with ULEZ (© Lorna Jane | Dreamstime.com)

While low-emission zones (LEZ) are crucial in cutting emissions and improving urban mobility, there is pushback from citizens who don't want their ability to travel impeded.

EIT Urban Mobility's new study on Urban Vehicle Access Regulations (UVARs) looks at the examples set by European cities such as Milan, Barcelona and London.

An initiative of the European Union's European Institute of Innovation & Technology (EIT), the report was developed in collaboration with Abertis Mobility Services (AMS) and demonstrates the need for EU and national level guidance to showcase best practices in order to meet climate neutrality targets by 2050.

In Europe, 94% of the urban population is exposed to NO2 pollution levels above World Health Organisation guidelines - and people want cleaner mobility.

But access to UVARs and availability of information is often a subject of complaints from motorists who are not aware of local requirements - hence the need for the provision of information and data sharing.

“UVAR are emerging as crucial for cities on their path to net zero mobility across Europe and beyond," explains Maria Tsavachidis, CEO of EIT Urban Mobility.

"The growing number of diverse initiatives like LEZ, congestion charging zones, and others, call for actively involving stakeholders and citizens, and to properly communicate these schemes’ objectives." 

Christian Barrientos, CEO of AMS, says LEZ deployments are a "first step in reducing pollution and improving air quality in cities".

But he warns: "Once all cars have been renewed to electric and cleaner vehicles, traffic congestion will reappear.”

“Following the examples of Milan and London, integrating LEZ and congestion charge can encourage a real change in behaviour and convince citizens to leave their cars at home and use more sustainable and efficient ways of transportation.”

But cities must clearly explain the advantages to their citizens, he says: “Local authorities need to strive to communicate the benefits of these schemes well and ensure enforcement and acceptance, and also explain that funds raised will be allocated to guarantee the long-term sustainability of public transportation and active mobility."

Read the report here
                                                    

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cut freight deliveries – improve Southampton’s air quality
    November 23, 2018
    Taking the pressure off cities’ road networks can have a beneficial effect on the environment. David Crawford looks at a new economic model which seeks to quantify the societal effect of freight traffic in Southampton, one of the UK’s five most polluted cities Cuts of 60% or more in volumes of freight deliveries are being predicted - along with badly-needed improvements in air quality - from a load consolidation scheme currently being introduced in the UK port city of Southampton. The forecasts are based o
  • European Court of Justice rules Uber as a Transport service
    December 22, 2017
    The European Court of Justice has ruled against Uber, concluding it to be a transport service, which will require it to have stricter regulation and licensing as a taxi operator within the EU. The decision follows a challenge presented by taxi drivers in Barcelona who were seeking a declaration from a court in 2014 that activities of Uber Systems Spain, amounted to misleading practices and acts of unfair competition.
  • Consortium welcomes Euro ITS directive 
    February 2, 2022
    C2C-CC supports proposed focus on interoperability and backward compatibility
  • Coalition to shape EU e-scooter policies 
    February 12, 2021
    New group is prioritising urban mobility, data governance and circular economy