Skip to main content

Welsh default 20mph limit leads to 4mph drop in driver speed

Transport for Wales' preliminary figures show average reduction in first three months
By Adam Hill February 22, 2024 Read time: 3 mins
Average speeds dropped from 28.9mph to 24.8mph (© Chrissnape30 | Dreamstime.com)

The 20mph default speed limit in built-up areas of Wales, introduced in September last year, has led to a fall in drivers' speed, according to Transport for Wales.

Data over the first three months shows 'weighted mean' speeds (that is, average speeds when differences for traffic volumes are taken into account) on a sample of main restricted roads in Wales dropped by an average of 4mph: 24.8mph instead of 28.9mph.

While there has been opposition to the limit, Transport for Wales says it expected this behaviour change from drivers.

A Task Force Group report said in 2020: “There is overwhelming evidence that lower speeds result in fewer collisions and a reduced severity of injuries; and consistent evidence that casualties are reduced when 20mph limits are introduced. It should be noted that these benefits are achieved even when average speeds do not drop to 20mph - any speed reduction leads to a positive outcome. Speed reductions are expected to increase over time as people become accustomed to the lower limits and slower driving is normalised.”

Operation Ugain, the police-led motorist engagement campaign, also published this month, shows that most vehicles are driving below the current enforcement threshold.

Figures from the first areas that implemented 20mph, prior to the national roll-out, show that 65% of vehicles monitored were travelling 24mph or under, compared to 50% prior to introduction of 20mph. Those travelling at the highest speeds also reduced by an average of 3mph, the government says.

Lee Waters, Wales deputy minister for climate change, says: "As a result, we can expect fewer collisions, fewer deaths and fewer severe injuries. Reducing harm and reducing the impact on the NHS and other emergency services."

Waters continued: "There is international evidence of strong links between lowering speeds and decreasing the number of collisions and people killed or injured from them. For example, research undertaken by the Transport Research Laboratory in 2000 shows that for urban roads with low average speeds, there is an average 6% reduction in collisions with each 1mph reduction in average speed."

Pedestrians are around five times more likely to be killed when hit by a vehicle travelling at 30mph than a vehicle travelling at 20mph.

Waters said the speed of vehicles is one of the main reasons why people do not walk or cycle more or let their children do so: "Lowering speeds in our built-up communities, can therefore contribute to better and safer environments for active travel, which in turn has significant public health benefits."

People who feel 20mph has been wrongly applied to a particular road should let their local council or highway authority know, Waters added.

"There appear to have been some inconsistences in the ways highway authorities have applied our guidance to make exceptions – that is, to change the speed limit on some roads from the default 20mph back to 30mph."

Experts have reviewed this issue and key recommendations in their report include: expanding and clarification of the exceptions guidance to help Highway Authorities take into account local context more fully and to provide a broader context of guidance on all speed limits in settlements, not just those subject to the default.

The Review Team also suggest training for highway authority officers should be developed to support them in interpreting and applying the guidance; and that legal advice should be sought on the potential liability of highway authorities when making exceptions to the default 20mph limit.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • Norwegian study indicates benefits of average speed enforcement
    November 4, 2014
    Evaluation of the crash effects of section control, or average speed enforcement, carried out at 14 sites in Norway has found a reduction of the number of injury crashes by between 12 and 22 per cent and a statistically significant reduction of the number of killed or severely injured road users (KSI) by between 49 and 54 per cent. Each section control site consists of a stretch or road between two speed cameras (four speed cameras at sites with bidirectional section control), both of which take pictures
  • Caltrans takes the long view of transport
    October 21, 2016
    Caltrans’ Malcolm Dougherty took time out of his schedule at ITS America 2016 in San Jose to talk to ITS International about current and future challenges. As director of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) since mid-2012, many would say that Malcolm Dougherty has one of the best jobs in transportation. Caltrans is one of the most progressive and innovative transport authorities, implementing policies to encourage cycling, piloting new
  • Active traffic management increases safety and capacity
    February 2, 2012
    WSDOT is deploying Active Traffic Management in order to increase safety and capacity on its strategic roads. WSDOT's Patricia Michaud elaborates