Skip to main content

UK smart motorways scrapped due to 'lack of public confidence'

'Pause' on roll-out has been made permanent - with £1bn cost also cited as a factor
By Adam Hill April 17, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
They think it's all over (© Jonathan Mitchell | Dreamstime.com)

The UK government has abandoned the building of any new smart motorways.

This is "due to financial pressures and lack of confidence felt by drivers", a statement from the UK Department for Transport (DfT) says.

Concerns have been raised over the safety of these highways, whose frequent all-lane running (ALR) means what would normally be the hard shoulder is used for live traffic to cope with increased demand.

Cameras and sensors were supposed to alert motorists to an incident, such as a broken-down car, in this inside lane - although some of the technology has not worked well enough or, on some sections, does not seem to be in use at all.

Gaps between safe 'refuge areas' can be as much as 1.6 miles on the smart motorway network - despite the government acknowledging in 2021 that they should be around half that distance from one another.

A coroner recorded a verdict of unlawful killing after the deaths of two men hit on England's M1 in June 2019, and the government 'paused' the roll-out of smart motorways a year ago to gather more data on safety.

But it is not just about driver confidence in safety - cost is also a factor in the decision.

"Initial estimations suggest constructing future smart motorway schemes would have cost more than £1 billion and cancelling these schemes will allow more time to track public confidence in smart motorways over a longer period," the DfT says.

Three smart motorways due for construction in the Road Investment Strategy (2025-30), as well as the 11 previously paused schemes, will now not go ahead.

But the M56 J6-8 and M6 J21a-26 will be completed, "given they are already over three-quarters constructed".

A previous pledge to invest £900m to improve safety on existing ALR motorways is still in place, including £390m of new money for 150 extra emergency areas - around a 50% increase in places to stop by 2025. 

UK prime minister Rishi Sunak said: "All drivers deserve to have confidence in the roads they use to get around the country. That’s why last year I pledged to stop the building of all new smart motorways, and today I’m making good on that promise."

Transport secretary Mark Harper said: "We want the public to know that this government is listening to their concerns."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The problem of mass transit ridership post-Covid 19
    June 9, 2020
    Several pillars of Mobility as a Service – notably public transit, ride-share and micromobility – are under pressure as ridership plummets.
  • Smart Cities put people, prudence and businesses before technology
    December 4, 2014
    Caroline Haynes tells ITS International that transport planners and equipment suppliers need to adopt different thinking and the smartest cities don’t call themselves smart. The term Smart Cities has been around for some time and has become something of a catch-all term applied to novel or futuristic technology deployed in an urban setting.
  • Technology targets Red-X transgressors
    February 25, 2016
    Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears. With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and
  • Should it be end of the road for right-turns on red?
    April 10, 2024
    Banning right-hand turns after stopping for a red light is gaining momentum in the US. But the debate continues about whether it will result in fewer incidents between vehicles and alternative mobility users. David Arminas reports