Skip to main content

UK smart motorways scrapped due to 'lack of public confidence'

'Pause' on roll-out has been made permanent - with £1bn cost also cited as a factor
By Adam Hill April 17, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
They think it's all over (© Jonathan Mitchell | Dreamstime.com)

The UK government has abandoned the building of any new smart motorways.

This is "due to financial pressures and lack of confidence felt by drivers", a statement from the UK Department for Transport (DfT) says.

Concerns have been raised over the safety of these highways, whose frequent all-lane running (ALR) means what would normally be the hard shoulder is used for live traffic to cope with increased demand.

Cameras and sensors were supposed to alert motorists to an incident, such as a broken-down car, in this inside lane - although some of the technology has not worked well enough or, on some sections, does not seem to be in use at all.

Gaps between safe 'refuge areas' can be as much as 1.6 miles on the smart motorway network - despite the government acknowledging in 2021 that they should be around half that distance from one another.

A coroner recorded a verdict of unlawful killing after the deaths of two men hit on England's M1 in June 2019, and the government 'paused' the roll-out of smart motorways a year ago to gather more data on safety.

But it is not just about driver confidence in safety - cost is also a factor in the decision.

"Initial estimations suggest constructing future smart motorway schemes would have cost more than £1 billion and cancelling these schemes will allow more time to track public confidence in smart motorways over a longer period," the DfT says.

Three smart motorways due for construction in the Road Investment Strategy (2025-30), as well as the 11 previously paused schemes, will now not go ahead.

But the M56 J6-8 and M6 J21a-26 will be completed, "given they are already over three-quarters constructed".

A previous pledge to invest £900m to improve safety on existing ALR motorways is still in place, including £390m of new money for 150 extra emergency areas - around a 50% increase in places to stop by 2025. 

UK prime minister Rishi Sunak said: "All drivers deserve to have confidence in the roads they use to get around the country. That’s why last year I pledged to stop the building of all new smart motorways, and today I’m making good on that promise."

Transport secretary Mark Harper said: "We want the public to know that this government is listening to their concerns."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Open road tolling: safer with less congestion
    January 30, 2012
    Michael J. Davis of PBS&J looks at the positive effect that open road tolling can have on safety
  • MaaS: 130,000 chances for a bad user experience
    May 4, 2020
    Johan Herrlin, CEO of transit data specialist Ito World, puts himself in the hotseat with ITS International to talk about, among other things, why a beautifully designed MaaS app with a perfect subscription model is still a failure if you get your customers lost along the way
  • The twisting path to enforcement’s future
    June 5, 2014
    Survey reveals some division of views about enforcement’s future as Colin Sowman discovers. Technological advances and legislative changes pose many questions for those involved in road enforcement, ranging from the changing demands of privacy and data protection legislation to the practicalities on multi-speed enforcement. So to get the industry’s views ITS International took soundings on some of these bigger questions. In a world where many vehicles are fitted with GPS linked ‘black box’ telematics system
  • Weigh in motion reduces road wear, increases toll revenue
    January 24, 2012
    IRD, Inc's Terry Bergan discusses future applications of weigh in motion technology. The application in recent years of Weigh In Motion (WIM) at tollgates has been driven by recognition of the fact that there is economic value, which can be levied, attached to Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) which haul laden (and are therefore heavy) rather than empty. As wear and damage to road surfaces increases exponentially with weight, the targeting of HGVs in particular makes sense from both the economic and maintenance p