Skip to main content

GHSA urges cannabis messaging

As cannabis use increases in US, report calls for better communication about road safety
By Adam Hill August 26, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
More drivers in fatal crashes in the US tested positive for cannabis during the Covid pandemic (© Evgenyp | Dreamstime.com)

As cannabis use has been legalised in more US states, more drivers in fatal crashes in the US tested positive for the drug during the Covid pandemic.

This has prompted authorities to issue guidance about the types of safety messages to cannabis users that do and don’t work. 

The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA), Responsibility.org and the National Alliance to Stop Impaired Driving (Nasid) have released a report that provides guidance on how State Highway Safety Offices (SHSOs) can better communicate with cannabis users about safe driving.

Cannabis Consumers and Safe Driving: Responsible Use Messaging points out that recreational cannabis was legal nowhere in the US in 2011 - now it is permitted in 18 states and more ballots on the issue are expected in other states in November.

The report emphasises the need for effective public outreach and education.

An AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety survey found that 95% of people say driving while over the legal blood alcohol concentration limit is very or extremely dangerous - but only 69% believe it is dangerous to drive within an hour of consuming cannabis.

“Motorists need to know the dangers of driving under the influence,” said GHSA executive director Jonathan Adkins.

“But that message won’t be heard if it’s outdated, irrelevant or insulting to cannabis consumers. This new report offers a playbook to help states develop messaging that resonates with cannabis users and prompts them to refrain from driving for their own safety and the safety of everyone else on the road.”

The report highlights lessons learned from outreach efforts in Colorado and Washington, which were the first states to legalise cannabis, as well as more recent efforts in Connecticut and Wyoming. 

The need for dedicated funding, forming partnerships with the cannabis industry and finding trusted ambassadors to convey factual driving messages are among the key findings of the report.

“Impaired driving, whether it involves alcohol, cannabis, other drugs or a combination of substances, is wreaking havoc on our nation’s roads, and we all must respond quickly and effectively,” said Darrin Grondel, director of Nasid. 

For more on this story, see the North America edition of ITS International September/October 2022, which is out soon

Related Content

  • March 10, 2021
    IBTTA: use tolls to raise the grade
    Sobering report on state of US roads suggests road user charging on horizon, IBTTA says
  • October 28, 2016
    Alcohol interlocks aid drink drive adherence
    The use of alcohol interlocks to prevent drink driving and change driver behaviour is gaining ground around the world but needs greater buy-in from authorities as Colin Sowman discovers. The often repeated mantra says that prevention is better than cure - and none more so than in the case of drink-driving. The introduction of the breathalyser provided an objective indication of alcohol consumption instead of having drivers touch their nose or walk in a straight line. Initially breathalysers were used as a r
  • April 17, 2012
    Calls for drunk driving prevention research measure
    A broad range of safety, auto, insurance and alcohol industry groups and companies has called on the US Congress to pass legislation to provide funding for an advanced drunk driving detection research programme. They claim it could lead to more than 8,000 fewer highway fatalities each year and a nationwide economic cost saving of approximately US$130 billion annually. In a letter to House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee the groups called for inclusion of the ROADS SAFE (Research of Alcohol Detect
  • April 29, 2015
    Foundation funds research for informed campaigning
    ITS International talks to Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the transport research and lobbying organisation, the RAC Foundation. It is through the eyes of an economist that Professor Stephen Glaister, emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and director of the RAC Foundation, views current and future transport problems. Having spent 30 years at the London School of Economics and another 10 at Imperial, the move to the RAC Foundation was a radical departure from