Skip to main content

Mobile phones & driving & the rules of distraction

Making it illegal to hold your mobile phone while driving is designed to increase road safety, says Adam Hill. Cambridge Mobile Telematics has been looking at the numbers to see if it works
January 5, 2024 Read time: 3 mins
Put it down, it's the law (© Maksim Marchanka | Dreamstime.com)

Hands-free cellphone laws were passed in the US states of Ohio, Michigan, and Alabama in 2023, making it illegal to hold a phone while driving there. It’s relatively early days but Cambridge Mobile Telematics (CMT) has analysed the statistics to see whether drivers are taking any notice.

The company measures what it calls “phone motion distraction”, which happens when the phone screen is on and the phone is moving, indicating that the driver has it in their hand and therefore cannot be fully concentrated on the road ahead. The results are interesting: while CMT says that distracted driving is down in Ohio and Michigan – and more than 3,800 crashes have been prevented with new laws – it has actually increased in Alabama (see Look – no hands! below).

In some ways this fits a pattern: the company analysed another eight states that introduced hands-free legislation from 2018-21, and found that the average reduction in distraction was 13% in the first three months after the laws were introduced. However, by the end of 2022, distraction was up by 3% in these states compared to the month before the law.

 

"Every 10% increase in distracted driving raises the crash rate by 1.4%"

 

This is highly significant because CMT’s research suggests that every 10% increase in distracted driving raises the crash rate by 1.4%. This comes at a human and financial cost. NHTSA’s The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes from 2019 shows $340 billion in crash damages from 14.2 million crashes that year, averaging $23,954 per crash.

CMT says that, while distracted driving in Alabama fell slightly in the first month, it rose after that until, by month three, it was actually higher than before the law. Interestingly, a relative lack of media coverage may have been a factor. In Ohio, there were over 130 stories published about the initial drop in distracted driving and the prevention of crashes, while state governor Mike Dewine also tweeted about the results. In Michigan, CMT says, there were more than 20 articles about the hands-free bill performance after the first month. By stark contrast, it found one article in Alabama.

Despite this, any reduction in distraction levels is welcome: CMT estimates that, in the first month, Alabama was able to prevent 70% of crashes and $1.6 million in economic damages. “While the long-term performance in Alabama isn’t in line with Ohio and Michigan, these results show that even small improvements help reduce road risk and crashes,” CMT says.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Look – no hands!

Ohio
•    Start date: 4 April, 2023
•    Distraction 1 month before law: 1 minute and 39 seconds
•    Average distraction after law: 1 minute and 32 seconds
•    Overall distraction change: 7.5% reduction
•    Crashes prevented: 2,200
•    Fatalities prevented: 6
•    Economic damage prevented: $54 million

 

Michigan
•    Start date: 30 June, 2023
•    Distraction 1 month before law: 1:48
•    Average distraction after law: 1:34
•    Overall distraction change: 12.7% reduction
•    Crashes prevented: 1,600
•    Fatalities prevented: 4
•    Economic damage prevented: $38 million

 

Alabama
•    Start date: 16 June, 2023
•    Distraction 1 month before law: 2:05
•    Average distraction after law: 2:05
•    Overall distraction change: 0.3% increase
•    Crashes prevented: 70
•    Economic damage prevented: $1.6 million

Source: www.cmtelematics.com

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • IRD pleased with 2014 performance to date
    July 11, 2014
    International Road Dynamics’ results for the three and six one of the world's leading providers of systems and solutions for the three and six months ended 31 May show total revenue up 15 per cent year to date, which the company says is due to a strong growth in key geographic markets. Revenue in Canada and the US revenue rose 23 per cent year to date on solid performance in projects and product sales, while Latin America revenue increased 22 per cent year to date on significant project deliveries. Sout
  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • San Diego: Let there be (street)light
    March 30, 2020
    The influence of intelligent streetlights is spreading. David Crawford finds that San Diego’s deployment – and attendant legislation – may offer a blueprint for other cities going forward