Skip to main content

Cruise says it 'fell woefully short' in aftermath of October 2023 collision

Law firm report into reaction to AV incident in San Francisco finds 'mistakes in judgment'
By Adam Hill January 26, 2024 Read time: 3 mins
A Cruise vehicle in San Francisco (© Andreistanescu | Dreamstime.com)

Driverless car operator Cruise has accepted the conclusions and recommendations of a law firm's report into its response to a traffic incident on 2 October 2023, when one of its AVs dragged a female pedestrian 20 feet before coming to a stop.

The woman had been hit by another car, and was knocked into the path of the Cruise AV.

Cruise, a subsidiary of General Motors, retained law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to conduct a review into the collision itself and Cruise’s subsequent interactions with regulators and the media.

In a statement, Cruise says: "We acknowledge that we have failed to live up to the justifiable expectations of regulators and the communities we serve. In doing so, we also fell woefully short of our own expectations. We are profoundly remorseful both for the injuries to the pedestrian, as well as for breaching the trust of our regulators, the media, and the public."

Quinn Emanuel makes clear that: "The evidence reviewed to date does not establish that Cruise leadership or employees sought to intentionally mislead or hide from regulators the details of the October 2 accident."

However, it is critical of Cruise's response in the immediate aftermath of the collision. 

Cruise played - or attempted to play - a video in various meetings with regulators which showed the AV pulling forward after the impact, resulting in the pedestrian being dragged for 20 feet.

But the report says Cruise "did not verbally point out these facts to regulators or government officials in its meetings, despite video transmission issues that impeded or prevented regulators from seeing the pullover maneuver and pedestrian dragging".

Cruise also did not immediately update information as the full facts emerged, Quinn Emanuel found. The firm "continued instead to share incomplete facts and video about the accident with the media and the public".

Quinn Emanuel adds: "The reasons for Cruise’s failings in this instance are numerous: poor leadership, mistakes in judgment, lack of coordination, an 'us versus them' mentality with regulators, and a fundamental misapprehension of Cruise’s obligations of accountability and transparency to the government and the public. Cruise must take decisive steps to address these issues in order to restore trust and credibility."

Cruise says: "We are focused on advancing our technology and earning back public trust."

It adds that it is fully cooperating with the state and federal regulatory and enforcement agencies which have opened investigations or inquiries in connection with the incident, including the California DMV, the California Public Utilities Commission, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the US Department of Justice and the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Click here to read the full post by Cruise.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Autonomous vehicles will not hit UK roads for over a decade, says PA Consulting Group
    September 29, 2017
    PA Consulting Group's latest research on autonomous vehicles (AVs) suggests that despite much hype, they are more than 10 years away from being a common sight on UK roads. PA's findings revealed that while progress is being made around technology, the rest of the ecosystem to support driverless cars - for example regulation, insurance, compliance, roads, users - still needs a lot of development. The recent launch of the Government's MERIDIAN scheme progressed plans for CAV technology development in th
  • Need for best practice enforcement standards
    February 3, 2012
    Leading systems suppliers discuss how recent events in Italy have affected the automated enforcement sector and how the situation might be remediated
  • Infrastructure funding and road user charging – debate continues
    February 1, 2012
    Jack Opiola provides an overview of the ongoing debate over US infrastructure funding and the progress – or lack of it – towards vehicles miles travelled road user charging. The future funding of transportation and mobility infrastructure is attracting increased attention. There has been sharp debate in the US, where landmark reports from the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission both stated that the cu
  • European safety drive
    April 25, 2012
    The European Commission is keen to boost road safety and analysis of road accident statistics. A key component of this move will be improving transparency over the safety of road infrastructure, in accordance with their obligations under European law. So far 11 European member states have been warned by the European Commission to be more open about the safety on infrastructure networks.