Skip to main content

San Francisco set to introduce speed enforcement cameras in 2025

They will be in 33 locations from early next year as part of bid to reduce collisions in city
By Adam Hill March 15, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
The streets of San Francisco... with added enforcement cameras next year (© Michael Vi | Dreamstime.com)

San Francisco is to install automated speed enforcement cameras for the first time in 2025.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) says they will be introduced at 33 locations on city-owned streets (as opposed to freeways or state-owned roads), following an analysis of speeding hotspots.

More than 70 locations were identified, with a concentration on locations with the highest percentage of vehicles traveling 10mph or more over the posted speed limit. 

The cameras will therefore be distributed along San Francisco’s High Injury Network (HIN) "with at least two cameras in each Supervisor’s district and at many key freeway touchdown points in the city", SFMTA says.

HIN is the 12% of city streets that account for 68% of San Francisco's serious and fatal roadway injuries. The team identified locations near schools, senior service centres, parks and areas with high pedestrian activity - and found blocks there which are suitable for speed cameras, with clear sight lines and existing mid-block streetlight poles owned by the city. 

The cameras will enforce lower speeds outside eight school sites, 12 parks, 11 social service sites serving seniors and people with disabilities and 12 neighbourhood commercial districts where many people walk or bike.

In 2023, the California State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 645, which authorised six cities, including San Francisco, to pilot the cameras for five years.

AB 645 sets 11mph or more as the speeding threshold that speed safety cameras will target. By law, there are three stipulations on where the cameras can be installed: if the street were previously designated a safety corridor with a high proportion of injury-related crashes; or has a high number of vehicle racing incidents; or is in a school zone.

Among next steps, SFMTA says it has to find a camera vendor, finalise the citation process, and build a community education and awareness campaign.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Low-costs solutions to improve pedestrian safety
    May 8, 2015
    David Crawford welcomes low-cost safety initiatives for pedestrians in America. Some 10 people die each week in accidents on crosswalks in the US, that’s more than 10% of all pedestrian fatalities in road traffic incidents - the number of which is running at a five-year high. Ensuring crosswalks are safe is key in supporting the growing enthusiasm for walking as a travel mode. In the last decade of the 20th century, numbers walking to work in the US fell by 26%; while, as recently as 2012, Americans were e
  • San Francisco bans facial recognition
    July 23, 2019
    San Francisco has become the first US city to ban facial recognition software – and it is a move which has implications for transit agencies as well as police forces worldwide Big Brother is watching you’, goes the famous saying. Well, not in San Francisco he isn’t. Legislators in the Californian city – home to the tech gold rush and embracers of all things forward-looking – have decided that, after all, there should be limits to technology’s hold over us. By a margin of eight votes to one, the city’s
  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • The smart in smart parking
    March 29, 2018
    Whether you want to reduce congestion, increase parking revenue or reduce occupancy – or a mixture of all three – there is plenty of technology available. Andrew Bardin Williams considers the pros and cons. Drawn in by the promise of Smart City initiatives, communities across North America are embracing smart parking solutions in an effort to change citizens’ transportation behaviours for the better. They are doing this by using policy and ITS solutions to help de-incentivise parking for most people while