Skip to main content

San Francisco set to introduce speed enforcement cameras in 2025

They will be in 33 locations from early next year as part of bid to reduce collisions in city
By Adam Hill March 15, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
The streets of San Francisco... with added enforcement cameras next year (© Michael Vi | Dreamstime.com)

San Francisco is to install automated speed enforcement cameras for the first time in 2025.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) says they will be introduced at 33 locations on city-owned streets (as opposed to freeways or state-owned roads), following an analysis of speeding hotspots.

More than 70 locations were identified, with a concentration on locations with the highest percentage of vehicles traveling 10mph or more over the posted speed limit. 

The cameras will therefore be distributed along San Francisco’s High Injury Network (HIN) "with at least two cameras in each Supervisor’s district and at many key freeway touchdown points in the city", SFMTA says.

HIN is the 12% of city streets that account for 68% of San Francisco's serious and fatal roadway injuries. The team identified locations near schools, senior service centres, parks and areas with high pedestrian activity - and found blocks there which are suitable for speed cameras, with clear sight lines and existing mid-block streetlight poles owned by the city. 

The cameras will enforce lower speeds outside eight school sites, 12 parks, 11 social service sites serving seniors and people with disabilities and 12 neighbourhood commercial districts where many people walk or bike.

In 2023, the California State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 645, which authorised six cities, including San Francisco, to pilot the cameras for five years.

AB 645 sets 11mph or more as the speeding threshold that speed safety cameras will target. By law, there are three stipulations on where the cameras can be installed: if the street were previously designated a safety corridor with a high proportion of injury-related crashes; or has a high number of vehicle racing incidents; or is in a school zone.

Among next steps, SFMTA says it has to find a camera vendor, finalise the citation process, and build a community education and awareness campaign.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    December 4, 2012
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m
  • Investment in pedestrian, cycling initiatives pays off
    June 30, 2014
    Five years after the Non-motorised Transportation Pilot Program (NTPP) was established to measure the impact of investment in walking and cycling initiatives, the US Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has reported a 22.8 per cent increase in walking and a 48.3 per cent increase in cycling, while an estimated 85.1 million vehicle miles were avoided. The NTPP provided approximately US$25 million each to four pilot communities (Columbia, Missouri; Marin County, California; Minneapolis area, Minnesota; an
  • Stepped speed limits improve workzone congestion and safety
    January 30, 2012
    Traffic flow has been improved, congestion eased and safety increased - by a system of 'stepped speed limits' introduced to UK roadworks. URS Scott Wilson principal consultant Jamie Uff reports
  • Lyft, Uber have mixed impact on San Fran mobility
    May 14, 2018
    The extent to which ride-hailing has become a real force in the mobility landscape of San Francisco is great for consumers – but there are downsides, a report finds. Andrew Stone takes a look. Uber and Lyft, the two major ride-hailing platforms in San Francisco, are out-competing local cab firms in many ways - and are firmly established as a significant part of the daily mobility mix there, a recent study reveals. Researchers mined publicly-available data derived from the application programming interface