Skip to main content

NHTSA to release monthly ADS data

First safety reports now available for SAE Level 2 and Levels 3-5 automated driving systems
By Adam Hill June 17, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
The data details crashes which automakers and operators have reported to NHTSA since June 2021 (© BiancoBlue | Dreamstime.com)

ITS America has welcomed the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)'s publication of the initial round of data it has collected on the safety performance of advanced driving technologies.

The automated technologies include driver-assist for human drivers as well as driverless systems - and detail crashes which automakers and operators have reported to NHTSA since June 2021.

NHTSA has released summary reports for SAE Level 2 advanced driver assistance systems and SAE Levels 3-5 automated driving systems (ADS) - and has pledged to release data updates monthly from now on.

"We continue to advance the research, development, and deployment of these critical safety technologies, particularly given the record number of crashes fatalities on US roads," said Laura Chace, president and CEO of ITS America.

"We look forward to working with federal leaders to advance these innovations as part of a safe systems approach toward zero deaths.”

NHTSA says it is part of its commitment to "transparency, accountability and public safety".

“New vehicle technologies have the potential to help prevent crashes, reduce crash severity and save lives, and the Department is interested in fostering technologies that are proven to do so; collecting this data is an important step in that effort," said NHTSA administrator Dr. Steven Cliff.

"As we gather more data, NHTSA will be able to better identify any emerging risks or trends and learn more about how these technologies are performing in the real world.”

There are limitations to the data and it cannot be used to compare the safety of manufacturers.

Of the 130 reported crashes for ADS-equipped vehicles, 108 involved collisions with another vehicle, and 11 involved a vulnerable road user, such as a pedestrian or cyclist.

For vehicles with SAE L2 ADAS, alleged serious injuries or a fatality occurred in 11 of the 98 crashes where information on injuries was reported. Of the reported crashes for SAE L2 ADAS, at least 116 of the collisions were with another vehicle, and at least four involved a vulnerable road user.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • In-vehicle automation of safety compliance and other traffic violations
    January 24, 2012
    David Crawford explores new initiatives in enforcement. Achieving the EU’s new road safety target of reducing road traffic deaths by 50 per cent by 2020 depends on removing legal and institutional barriers to the deployment of new enforcement technologies, stresses Jan Malenstein. The senior ITS Adviser to Dutch National Police Agency the KLPD, and a European-level spokesperson on road and traffic safety, points to the importance of, among other requirements, an effective EUwide type approval process for fr
  • When traffic data can get it totally wrong
    November 30, 2021
    How can a highway devoid of traffic provide data suggesting it is filled with vehicles crawling along? Michael Vardi of Valerann provides an insight into how data can easily be skewed - and what can be done to prevent it
  • NVIDIA to buy AV mapper DeepMap
    June 28, 2021
    DeepMap tech will bolster NVIDIA Drive software platform's localisation capabilities
  • Texas moves to prevent wrong-way drivers
    May 30, 2014
    A study has shown the extent and ramifications of wrong way driving and proposed cost-effective countermeasures. Wrong way driving collisions occur relatively infrequently but the results can be devastating. Statistics from the US National Transportation Safety Board, an independent, federal all-modes agency, reveal that wrong way (WW) driving, account for only about 3% of accidents on high-speed divided highways but are much more likely to result in fatal and serious injuries.