Skip to main content

As many as '50,000' daily cases of illegal phone use on English roads

Results from UK DfT and Aecom using Acusensus tech suggest worrying scale of problem
By David Arminas June 17, 2024 Read time: 3 mins
Acusensus Heads Up technology in action (image: Acusensus)

Figures from the UK’s Department for Transport (DfT) suggest that there may be more than 50,000 daily instances of people driving while using a hand-held phone.

The data collated by the DfT in a project with infrastructure consulting firm Aecom - using images captured by technology from Acusensus -- suggests three in every thousand drivers observed on England’s roads are using a mobile phone whilst driving. 

The statistics also showed 4.8% of vehicle passengers were observed not wearing a seatbelt.

“Drivers who don’t wear their seatbelt are likely to continue this behaviour throughout an entire journey,” explains Geoff Collins, enforcement expert with Acusensus, which provides roadside cameras and software.

“If seen mid-journey [by camera detection] without a suitable restraint, this will probably have been the case all the way. However, hand-held mobile phone use is not usually continuous, so it might happen multiple times during a single journey, but not necessarily at the survey point.”

Because of this, it is possibly misleading to think that more seatbelt violations occur, he said. It is more likely that overall occurrences of distracted driving for any one journey are many times higher than monitored during this survey, which showed 0.3% at any one specific point on the road.

“Based on the observed violation rates from the surveys, if this was extrapolated across the entire network, it is likely that cars would account for more than 30,000 cases of illegal mobile phone use each day, with a further 20,000 or more cases from vans. This is despite there being only a quarter the number of vans using our roads, compared with cars.”

Collins said that more than 500,000 daily journeys by cars and vans are likely to occur without the driver being correctly restrained. Not wearing a seatbelt is a habitual behaviour that is likely to take place throughout every journey.

“It is important to remember that whilst the vast majority of these journeys end safely, this does not mean that it is safe. The risk of serious injury or fatality is dramatically greater should a collision occur,” he said.

Each site was surveyed on a weekday, either in the morning or afternoon, for a period of six hours. The observations were then analysed by human review.

The survey data was collected using Acusensus Heads Up technology, using bespoke roadside cameras to capture clear images through windscreens. The Acusensus solution can also uses artificial intelligence-based image analysis to flag up likely violations, although this was not used in the DfT study. This is a new way of gathering the data, which was previously collected by human observation at the roadside in real time.

Collins believes the scale of the risk on UK roads is now alarmingly clear.

“Distracted driving and not using a seatbelt are two of the fatal five risk factors, most likely to lead to serious harm when driving. The Heads Up technology not only helps to provide this background understanding, but it can also be used to provide violation records that are used for prosecution or education purposes, which has now been successfully carried out by many UK police forces. If used as part of a long-term strategic initiative, this solution would allow for a measured approach to improve driver behaviour, making the roads safer for everyone.”

Related Content

  • July 24, 2017
    Traffex snapshot reveals enforcement advances
    An indication of just how far beyond spot speed and red light the enforcement sector has progressed was evident in the range of new and improved equipment on display at the recent Traffex event in Birmingham. One of the key trends, particularly in the UK but also evident elsewhere, is the increase in average speed enforcement, according to RedSpeed’s managing director Robert Ryan, who predicts a big increase in installations this year. “The price point has reached a level authorities can afford,” he says, a
  • July 30, 2012
    Monitoring and transparency preserve enforcement's reputation
    What can be done to preserve automated enforcement's reputation in the face of media and public criticism? Here, system manufacturers and suppliers talk about what they think are the most appropriate business models. Recent events in Italy only served to once again to push automated enforcement into the media spotlight. At the heart of the matter were the numerous alleged instances of local authorities and their contract suppliers of enforcement services colluding to illegally shorten amber signal phase tim
  • January 24, 2012
    In-vehicle automation of safety compliance and other traffic violations
    David Crawford explores new initiatives in enforcement. Achieving the EU’s new road safety target of reducing road traffic deaths by 50 per cent by 2020 depends on removing legal and institutional barriers to the deployment of new enforcement technologies, stresses Jan Malenstein. The senior ITS Adviser to Dutch National Police Agency the KLPD, and a European-level spokesperson on road and traffic safety, points to the importance of, among other requirements, an effective EUwide type approval process for fr
  • October 15, 2021
    We need to talk about AVs
    Will driverless vehicles lead to more deaths and destroy more lives than their manual counterparts? Transport writer Colin Sowman argues that they will