Skip to main content

Combining OCR and LPR technology aids truck identification

Automatic reading of Department of Transport numbers can provide an effcient and reliable means for enhancing the saftey and securitiy of freight operations, argues vice president for cargo solutions at High Tech Services, Benjie Wells. A key element of port security is identification of trucks at entry points to freight terminals and handling points.
March 16, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
OCR systems present a competitive alternative with less infrastructure than conventional RFID readers

Automatic reading of Department of Transport numbers can provide an effcient and reliable means for enhancing the saftey and securitiy of freight operations, argues vice president for cargo solutions at High Tech Services, Benjie Wells.

A key element of port security is identification of trucks at entry points to freight terminals and handling points. Container facilities throughout the US and worldwide, whether port, intermodal or freight consolidators, are looking for ways to provide secure access as well as tracking of trucks at entry, exit and within the facility. Due to port congestion, increased truck turnaround time and significant growth expected in marine cargo during the coming decade, port operators have greater security requirements. This is especially so with regard to the trucking community and the need for positive identification through technology, such that would not require major infrastructure investment or complex operational processes.
Trucks can be identified in a number of ways; by license plate, chassis and container numbers, or by Department of Transport (DOT) number. Until recently, cargo in marine ports has been identified only by the first three of these parameters.   

DOT readers

In 32 of the 50 states in the USA, every truck registered to haul freight is required to have a DOT number stenciled on the cab. Additionally, most commercial vehicles in the US – any that transport passengers or haul cargo across state lines – are required by the US Government to have a DOT number. This serves to provide a unique identifier when collecting and monitoring a company's vehicle safety information for audits, compliance reviews, crash investigations and inspections.
So why not use the DOT number to retrieve data from a commercial truck at ports and other facilities? DOT numbers contain useful information that becomes available for systems when entered either manually or via OCR (optical character recognition). With OCR reading of DOT numbers, processes can be automated, thus demanding manual input only for exceptions and processes requiring intervention. Such a system, coupled with license plate recognition (LPR), will enable automation of processes whereby DOT and LPR checks are performed for security and safety purposes.
Automating DOT entry into a system will serve to not only make data collection and checking more streamlined but also digitize the entire process, thus creating a digital record for real time analysis and feedback as well as for investigation of incidents or events.

Container Terminals

Secure access in container terminals is paramount, including tracking of trucks at entry, exit and inside the facility. Various technologies are considered when tagging and tracking trucks, with RFID being the most common. RFID tags identify the truck, license plate, year of manufacture and other unique information depending on the application and data entered for retrieval.
Although reading the RFID tag requires infrastructure not unlike the equivalent of camera requirements for a DOT system, a significant difference in these two technologies is in their availability – DOT number exists on all trucks, RFID tags do not.
Regulations through government entities sometimes require tagging of trucks and without such regulation some freight operating companies have equipped their fleets with tags. However, there is no government mandate for RFID tagging and should this be introduced, there remain challenges regarding who pays for the devices, distribution and maintenance of the tags, as well as the infrastructure to read them. Although several port-wide efforts have resulted in successful use of RFID tags, 4015 HTS - OCR systems present a competitive solution with less infrastructure. And for existing RFID installations, OCR can give an additional layer of security and reliability.
Technology currently in use to identify trucks at container terminals includes both LPR and RFID. Both provide useful data for security purposes and downstream business processes. Use of all three technologies – LPR, RFID and DOT – holds the key to unique identification of a truck at a specific point. Any one may be used to identify. However, each by itself has limitations. In combination, these technologies yield not only higher levels of accuracy, but also greater application of security.

Additional applications

 Any location where a truck is required to stop to relay information, reading of DOT number can be utilized. Since the DOT number is a unique identifier, this can be used as key information to look up data in either custom or DOT databases. For instance, at border crossings OCR reading of DOT number can be deployed with LPR to improve operational efficiencies. Throughput of lanes equipped with this technology is significantly increased and the traditional long wait times for processing can be reduced. By eliminating manual data entry, information is much more readily available for officers to make determinations regarding potential violations and safety hazards.

Related Content

  • RFID windshield labels aid India’s border control
    November 7, 2012
    Border controls in Maharashtra, the commercial capital state of India, are in the process of being automated by the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) in an effort to reduce processing times and traffic queues. Confidex, Finnish manufacturer of speciality RFID tags, has supplied its RFID windshield labels for use in the first fully automatic border control system to be installed, and utilises passive UHF RFID based Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) technology that enables both relia
  • All-electronic toll collection success in Denver
    January 30, 2012
    Teri England, Diamond Consulting Services Ltd, describes the E-470's switchover to all-electronic toll collection. In June 2007, the E-470 Public Highway Authority made the business decision to transition to an All-Electronic Toll Collection (AETC) system - in other words, become a cashless road.
  • The bus to IP access control has left the station
    April 9, 2014
    David Lenot examines how mass transit agencies can benefit from IP access control and the features required to ensure a sound investment. With millions of commuters relying on their services daily, mass transit agencies are faced with the unfortunate reality that their operations are susceptible to threats. A single incidence of unauthorised access to restricted areas and buildings could be the catalyst to damaged property, endangered lives or other unfortunate events. Unlike an international airport
  • Tighten up on cyber security before hackers infiltrate ITS infrastructure
    October 19, 2015
    This year’s ITS World Congress in Bordeaux will have three sessions dedicated to cyber security and the issue will also be addressed under connected and automated vehicles categories. Jon Masters finds out why. American security researchers Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek attracted international press coverage recently when they demonstrated how they could hack into and take control of a vehicle from a remote laptop. While the implications are clearly serious for vehicle manufacturers, highway and transpor