Skip to main content

Technology targets Red-X transgressors

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears. With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and
February 25, 2016 Read time: 4 mins
Changed signage make compliance more intuitive.

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears.

With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - 8101 Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and to provide a clear path to an incident for first responders. It is illegal use the closed lane beyond the red-X signal.

However, Nick Pinnington, senior ITS engineer with 7942 Arup told the recent ITS (UK) Enforcement Conference: “Red X non-compliance has become a national issue.” He cited a report covering 45 lane closures on London’s orbital motorway (M25) where more than 4,400 non-compliant motorists (roughly 8% of the traffic) were detected. And between July and December 2014 red-X non-compliance accounted for 130 of 210 near-misses recorded in all-lane running sections of the M25. Similarly at the Hindhead Tunnel in Southern England, 75 near-miss incidents have been recorded after drivers ignored the red-X signs. 

As part of a wider compliance strategy HE is developing to deliver both safety and congestion benefits the organisation has commissioned Arup and 3525 Aecom to run a trial designed to target, engage and inform red-X offenders. The trial builds on previous work, to tackle hard shoulder misuse on Smart Motorway sections where the hard shoulders are opened as a running lanes in times of congestion.

Pinnington, and Aecom’s technical director David Cowell, described the three-phase framework:

Engineering - such as signage changes to make compliance easier and more intuitive;

Education - to inform drivers of what constitutes compliant behaviour;

Enforcement - to tackle repeat offenders and those who wilfully disobey the law.

The M6 trial used the existing equipment above and beside the carriageways and processes already available in the existing back-office systems of the Central Motorway Police Group (CMPG) and Staffordshire Safer Roads Partnership (SSRP). Offenders were identified using ANPR cameras with the time and direction cross-referenced with Highways England’s database to ensure the hard shoulder was not open as a running lane when the offence occurred.

CMPG and SSRP processed the offenders’ information to allow access to the vehicle registration database and comply with data protection requirements.  Once verified, SSRP produced a warning letter, accompanied by an explanatory leaflet, as quickly as possible in order that the journey was still fresh in the driver’s memory.

More than 30,000 letters were issued to drivers from across the UK during the seven-month study - although the majority lived in the vicinity of the study site. The letters contained a link to an online survey which allowed motorists to post feedback and many of the respondents claimed not to know the signage meant they could not use that lane.

Cowell said, “ Before the trial started around 5% of motorists ignored the red-X signs. This reduced to 4.6% during the trial and has continued to fall after the trial ended to the current level of 4.4%.” 

Following driver feedback, HE has improved the signage of dynamic hard shoulder sections, resulting in further improvements in compliance.

Most repeat offences occurred in the two- or three-week period before the warning letters arrived. No formal enforcement action has been taken against a handful of serial repeat offenders. 

HE plans to deploy the system in more locations using either mobile or permanent sites to address both hard shoulder misuse and the growth in red-X non-compliance. Currently compliance monitoring is being used to identify which locations would most benefit from such deployments and according to the presenters the same processes could also be used to identify close following (tailgating) vehicles.  

A new National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme course focussed on motorway driving is under consideration. Errant drivers may be offered the choice of attending this course as an alternative to an endorsement or a court appearance.  Also under re-evaluation are sections of the Highway Code and the driving test pertaining to Smart Motorways.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Iteris sees red over US road deaths
    November 26, 2019
    Drivers who run red lights are killing more than two people per day in the US, says an AAA report. James Esquivel of Iteris sets out some practical ways in which this might be stopped
  • Intergraph's I/Incident analyst selected by Arkansas highway and transportation department
    January 30, 2012
    Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) has selected I/Incident Analyst from Intergraph to improve the safety of its roadways. Of the 32 billion vehicle miles travelled in Arkansas last year, 78 per cent occurred within the state highway system managed by AHTD.
  • Independent analysis finds speed cameras do not reduce accidents
    June 10, 2014
    An independent analysis carried out by engineer Dave Finney of Thames Valley, UK speed camera data has found an increase in injuries after the devices were installed. The analysis, to evaluate the effect of fixed speed cameras on the number and severity of collisions at the sites where they are installed, was carried out on two groups of sites. One group includes all fixed speed camera sites in the Thames Valley area (covering Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire) that were active at the start of 2
  • ATS study finds school bus stop arm cameras effective in reducing violations
    July 4, 2014
    Analysis carried out by American Traffic Systems (ATS) on routes where its CrossingGuard school bus stop arm cameras are installed found that, while the number of violations on those routes fell by more than 15 per cent during the school year, customers have reported stop arm running violation decreases fleet wide, on all buses. The analysis also finds that less than one per cent of drivers who receive one ticket get a second citation. Both results indicate the camera safety programs are off to a quick