Skip to main content

Technology targets Red-X transgressors

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears. With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and
February 25, 2016 Read time: 4 mins
Changed signage make compliance more intuitive.

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears.

With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - 8101 Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and to provide a clear path to an incident for first responders. It is illegal use the closed lane beyond the red-X signal.

However, Nick Pinnington, senior ITS engineer with 7942 Arup told the recent ITS (UK) Enforcement Conference: “Red X non-compliance has become a national issue.” He cited a report covering 45 lane closures on London’s orbital motorway (M25) where more than 4,400 non-compliant motorists (roughly 8% of the traffic) were detected. And between July and December 2014 red-X non-compliance accounted for 130 of 210 near-misses recorded in all-lane running sections of the M25. Similarly at the Hindhead Tunnel in Southern England, 75 near-miss incidents have been recorded after drivers ignored the red-X signs. 

As part of a wider compliance strategy HE is developing to deliver both safety and congestion benefits the organisation has commissioned Arup and 3525 Aecom to run a trial designed to target, engage and inform red-X offenders. The trial builds on previous work, to tackle hard shoulder misuse on Smart Motorway sections where the hard shoulders are opened as a running lanes in times of congestion.

Pinnington, and Aecom’s technical director David Cowell, described the three-phase framework:

Engineering - such as signage changes to make compliance easier and more intuitive;

Education - to inform drivers of what constitutes compliant behaviour;

Enforcement - to tackle repeat offenders and those who wilfully disobey the law.

The M6 trial used the existing equipment above and beside the carriageways and processes already available in the existing back-office systems of the Central Motorway Police Group (CMPG) and Staffordshire Safer Roads Partnership (SSRP). Offenders were identified using ANPR cameras with the time and direction cross-referenced with Highways England’s database to ensure the hard shoulder was not open as a running lane when the offence occurred.

CMPG and SSRP processed the offenders’ information to allow access to the vehicle registration database and comply with data protection requirements.  Once verified, SSRP produced a warning letter, accompanied by an explanatory leaflet, as quickly as possible in order that the journey was still fresh in the driver’s memory.

More than 30,000 letters were issued to drivers from across the UK during the seven-month study - although the majority lived in the vicinity of the study site. The letters contained a link to an online survey which allowed motorists to post feedback and many of the respondents claimed not to know the signage meant they could not use that lane.

Cowell said, “ Before the trial started around 5% of motorists ignored the red-X signs. This reduced to 4.6% during the trial and has continued to fall after the trial ended to the current level of 4.4%.” 

Following driver feedback, HE has improved the signage of dynamic hard shoulder sections, resulting in further improvements in compliance.

Most repeat offences occurred in the two- or three-week period before the warning letters arrived. No formal enforcement action has been taken against a handful of serial repeat offenders. 

HE plans to deploy the system in more locations using either mobile or permanent sites to address both hard shoulder misuse and the growth in red-X non-compliance. Currently compliance monitoring is being used to identify which locations would most benefit from such deployments and according to the presenters the same processes could also be used to identify close following (tailgating) vehicles.  

A new National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme course focussed on motorway driving is under consideration. Errant drivers may be offered the choice of attending this course as an alternative to an endorsement or a court appearance.  Also under re-evaluation are sections of the Highway Code and the driving test pertaining to Smart Motorways.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Tattile explores freedom of movement
    October 5, 2020
    Dense urban centres are complex enforcement environments – but camera-based traffic systems enable all aspects of monitoring, explains Massimiliano Cominelli of Tattile
  • Does enforcement merit a place in the EU's ITS action Plan?
    February 3, 2012
    Colin Wilson, IBI Group, looks at the implications for enforcement of the European Commission's new Action Plan for the Deployment of ITS in Europe
  • Report highlights cost effectiveness of crash reduction strategy
    November 21, 2017
    Local authorities in the UK needs an immediate injection of £200 million to tackle the high risk road sections, according to a new report from the Road Safety Foundation charity and Ageas UK. Called Cutting the Cost of Dangerous Roads, the report reveals that UK motorways and ‘A’ roads on the EuroRAP network make up 10% of the road network that contains half of all road deaths. It found that single carriageway ‘A’ roads have a risk factor seven times higher than motorways and nearly three times that of d
  • Data holds the key to combating VRU casualties
    May 8, 2015
    Accident analysis software can help authorities identify common causes and make best use of their budgets, as Will Baron explains. More than 1.2 million people die on the world’s roads each year and according to the World Health Organisation, half of these are pedestrians and vulnerable road users (those whose vehicle does not have a protective shell, such as motorcyclists and cyclists). While much has been done to improve road safety and cut the number of deaths and serious injuries on our roads, a great d