Skip to main content

Technology targets Red-X transgressors

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears. With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and
February 25, 2016 Read time: 4 mins
Changed signage make compliance more intuitive.

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears.

With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - 8101 Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and to provide a clear path to an incident for first responders. It is illegal use the closed lane beyond the red-X signal.

However, Nick Pinnington, senior ITS engineer with 7942 Arup told the recent ITS (UK) Enforcement Conference: “Red X non-compliance has become a national issue.” He cited a report covering 45 lane closures on London’s orbital motorway (M25) where more than 4,400 non-compliant motorists (roughly 8% of the traffic) were detected. And between July and December 2014 red-X non-compliance accounted for 130 of 210 near-misses recorded in all-lane running sections of the M25. Similarly at the Hindhead Tunnel in Southern England, 75 near-miss incidents have been recorded after drivers ignored the red-X signs. 

As part of a wider compliance strategy HE is developing to deliver both safety and congestion benefits the organisation has commissioned Arup and 3525 Aecom to run a trial designed to target, engage and inform red-X offenders. The trial builds on previous work, to tackle hard shoulder misuse on Smart Motorway sections where the hard shoulders are opened as a running lanes in times of congestion.

Pinnington, and Aecom’s technical director David Cowell, described the three-phase framework:

Engineering - such as signage changes to make compliance easier and more intuitive;

Education - to inform drivers of what constitutes compliant behaviour;

Enforcement - to tackle repeat offenders and those who wilfully disobey the law.

The M6 trial used the existing equipment above and beside the carriageways and processes already available in the existing back-office systems of the Central Motorway Police Group (CMPG) and Staffordshire Safer Roads Partnership (SSRP). Offenders were identified using ANPR cameras with the time and direction cross-referenced with Highways England’s database to ensure the hard shoulder was not open as a running lane when the offence occurred.

CMPG and SSRP processed the offenders’ information to allow access to the vehicle registration database and comply with data protection requirements.  Once verified, SSRP produced a warning letter, accompanied by an explanatory leaflet, as quickly as possible in order that the journey was still fresh in the driver’s memory.

More than 30,000 letters were issued to drivers from across the UK during the seven-month study - although the majority lived in the vicinity of the study site. The letters contained a link to an online survey which allowed motorists to post feedback and many of the respondents claimed not to know the signage meant they could not use that lane.

Cowell said, “ Before the trial started around 5% of motorists ignored the red-X signs. This reduced to 4.6% during the trial and has continued to fall after the trial ended to the current level of 4.4%.” 

Following driver feedback, HE has improved the signage of dynamic hard shoulder sections, resulting in further improvements in compliance.

Most repeat offences occurred in the two- or three-week period before the warning letters arrived. No formal enforcement action has been taken against a handful of serial repeat offenders. 

HE plans to deploy the system in more locations using either mobile or permanent sites to address both hard shoulder misuse and the growth in red-X non-compliance. Currently compliance monitoring is being used to identify which locations would most benefit from such deployments and according to the presenters the same processes could also be used to identify close following (tailgating) vehicles.  

A new National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme course focussed on motorway driving is under consideration. Errant drivers may be offered the choice of attending this course as an alternative to an endorsement or a court appearance.  Also under re-evaluation are sections of the Highway Code and the driving test pertaining to Smart Motorways.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Smart cameras offer real-time alerts
    April 10, 2014
    Intelligent traffic cameras open up a host of possibilities for traffic planners and controllers alike. If traffic management centres (TMCs) around the world are to cope with the increasing demands of growing traffic flows while maintaining or improving transport safety and efficiency, then video monitoring will have to be supplemented by automated warnings of incidents or deviations. According to Patrik Anderson, business development director at Swedish camera manufacturer Axis Communications, it is no
  • Loop detection still has a part in traffic management
    March 2, 2012
    Bob Lees, co-founder of Diamond Consulting Services, on why the loop detector just refuses to go away. The more strident proponents of newer and emergent detection technologies are quick to highlight what they see as the disadvantages, and hence the imminent passing, of the humble inductive loop. The more prosaic will acknowledge that loops continue to have a part to play in traffic management, falling back on the assertion that it is all a question of application. And yet year after year the loop, despite
  • Road signs removed to reduce ‘clutter’
    January 4, 2013
    In a response to a move to remove unnecessary clutter in cities and rural areas, more than 9,000 road traffic signs have been taken down in England, where local councils have been urged to think more creatively about the number and location of their location. Ministers have warned that excessive signs can be a distraction to motorists and make roads appear unattractive. In October 2011, the requirement for certain road signs was lifted; the government plans to give councils more discretion over where they p
  • Negative report for road safety cameras
    October 23, 2015
    An audit of the state’s speed cameras has found that the Queensland Police Service (QPS) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) in Australia have strayed from best practice in using the devices to reduce speeding, with a resultant effect on road safety, according to PSNews online. In his report Road Safety: Traffic Cameras, Acting Auditor-General, Anthony Close found that in the past seven years the QPS had issued 3,760,962 speeding tickets from camera-based evidence, with TMR collecting AU