Skip to main content

Technology targets Red-X transgressors

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears. With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and
February 25, 2016 Read time: 4 mins
Changed signage make compliance more intuitive.

Currently deployed technology is being used to detect motorists ignoring the ‘red-X’ signs that indicate the lane is closed, as Colin Sowman hears.

With an increasing network of ‘Smart Motorways’ - all-lane running or the opening of hard shoulders during times of congestion - 8101 Highways England (HE) has identified a growing problem with ‘red-X’ compliance. The ‘red-X’ sign signifies a closed lane or lanes and used to provide a safer area for stranded motorists, emergency workers or road maintenance crews and to provide a clear path to an incident for first responders. It is illegal use the closed lane beyond the red-X signal.

However, Nick Pinnington, senior ITS engineer with 7942 Arup told the recent ITS (UK) Enforcement Conference: “Red X non-compliance has become a national issue.” He cited a report covering 45 lane closures on London’s orbital motorway (M25) where more than 4,400 non-compliant motorists (roughly 8% of the traffic) were detected. And between July and December 2014 red-X non-compliance accounted for 130 of 210 near-misses recorded in all-lane running sections of the M25. Similarly at the Hindhead Tunnel in Southern England, 75 near-miss incidents have been recorded after drivers ignored the red-X signs. 

As part of a wider compliance strategy HE is developing to deliver both safety and congestion benefits the organisation has commissioned Arup and 3525 Aecom to run a trial designed to target, engage and inform red-X offenders. The trial builds on previous work, to tackle hard shoulder misuse on Smart Motorway sections where the hard shoulders are opened as a running lanes in times of congestion.

Pinnington, and Aecom’s technical director David Cowell, described the three-phase framework:

Engineering - such as signage changes to make compliance easier and more intuitive;

Education - to inform drivers of what constitutes compliant behaviour;

Enforcement - to tackle repeat offenders and those who wilfully disobey the law.

The M6 trial used the existing equipment above and beside the carriageways and processes already available in the existing back-office systems of the Central Motorway Police Group (CMPG) and Staffordshire Safer Roads Partnership (SSRP). Offenders were identified using ANPR cameras with the time and direction cross-referenced with Highways England’s database to ensure the hard shoulder was not open as a running lane when the offence occurred.

CMPG and SSRP processed the offenders’ information to allow access to the vehicle registration database and comply with data protection requirements.  Once verified, SSRP produced a warning letter, accompanied by an explanatory leaflet, as quickly as possible in order that the journey was still fresh in the driver’s memory.

More than 30,000 letters were issued to drivers from across the UK during the seven-month study - although the majority lived in the vicinity of the study site. The letters contained a link to an online survey which allowed motorists to post feedback and many of the respondents claimed not to know the signage meant they could not use that lane.

Cowell said, “ Before the trial started around 5% of motorists ignored the red-X signs. This reduced to 4.6% during the trial and has continued to fall after the trial ended to the current level of 4.4%.” 

Following driver feedback, HE has improved the signage of dynamic hard shoulder sections, resulting in further improvements in compliance.

Most repeat offences occurred in the two- or three-week period before the warning letters arrived. No formal enforcement action has been taken against a handful of serial repeat offenders. 

HE plans to deploy the system in more locations using either mobile or permanent sites to address both hard shoulder misuse and the growth in red-X non-compliance. Currently compliance monitoring is being used to identify which locations would most benefit from such deployments and according to the presenters the same processes could also be used to identify close following (tailgating) vehicles.  

A new National Driver Offender Retraining Scheme course focussed on motorway driving is under consideration. Errant drivers may be offered the choice of attending this course as an alternative to an endorsement or a court appearance.  Also under re-evaluation are sections of the Highway Code and the driving test pertaining to Smart Motorways.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • City of Greenville installs red-light safety camera program
    October 17, 2017
    To tackle fatalities caused by red-light running, the city of Greenville, North Carolina, has implemented a red-light safety camera program that will issue a $100 (£75) fine to offenders, which it hopes will reduce both violations and collisions. A-red light running violation occurs when a motorist enters an intersection after the traffic signal has turned red, but this does not include drivers already in the intersection when the signal changes to red (drivers waiting to turn).
  • Highways Agency chief executive to step down
    January 29, 2015
    The Chief Executive of the Highways Agency (HA), Graham Dalton, announced today that he is leaving his post in the summer. During his seven years in post Graham has led the agency through a time of financial constraint and of growing ambition for the strategic road network. He has led the agency as it has established a strong reputation for efficiency, for delivering capital investment, and for operating one of the most intensively used road networks in Europe. Graham Dalton said: “It has been a priv
  • Swedish drivers support speed cameras
    March 17, 2014
    In sharp contrast to many other countries drivers in Sweden support speed cameras and the planned expansion of the automated enforcement network. Sweden is embarking on a massive expansion of its speed camera network and is doing so with both a very high level of public acceptance and without its drivers feeling persecuted; a feat the administrations in many other countries would like to emulate. So how did this envious state of affairs come about? Magnus Ferlander director of business development and ma
  • Looking both ways for speeding vehicles
    June 9, 2015
    Single-camera bi-directional speed enforcement can reduce the cost of enforcing speeding on two-way roads without repositioning the camera. Truvelo has received UK type-approval for a simultaneous bi-directional (SBD) enforcement camera, the D-Cam P digital, which can capture speeding motorist both those travelling towards and away from the camera. It is also in the process of carrying out the first installations of the D-Cam P in the UK.