Skip to main content

Bus lane enforcement reduces costs, journey times

The Southcote Lane site in the UK town of Reading is a notorious shortcut for motorists travelling into the town centre. The resultant congestion at the end of the bus lane, when motorists tried to re-enter the main traffic flow, caused congestion and disruption to bus timetables. Reading Borough Council wanted a cost-efficient, effective solution to accurately capture bus lane violations and improve bus travel times. Reading became the first local authority in the UK to deploy Siemens's LaneHawk fully auto
May 4, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
The Southcote Lane site in the UK town of Reading is a notorious shortcut for motorists travelling into the town centre. The resultant congestion at the end of the bus lane, when motorists tried to re-enter the main traffic flow, caused congestion and disruption to bus timetables. 644 Reading Borough Council wanted a cost-efficient, effective solution to accurately capture bus lane violations and improve bus travel times.

Reading became the first local authority in the UK to deploy 189 Siemens's LaneHawk fully automated bus lane enforcement system. Based on Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) technology, LaneHawk automatically detects violations for a specific, timetabled period of 75 minutes each morning. All vehicles entering the restricted zone are classified as either authorised vehicles, or potentially violating vehicles, according to whether or not the vehicle registration number is included in a zone white list. Permitted vehicles might include buses, taxis, emergency vehicles and delivery vehicles. The white list is compiled by Reading Borough Council and is downloaded from the LaneHawk in-station to all ANPR camera outstations.

LaneHawk's high-resolution digital camera captures images of vehicles entering the zone. The images are then processed by the ANPR software to determine the vehicle's registration number. In addition, a separate colour camera captures a video clip of pre- and post-violation. This contextual video is recorded as evidence and removes any ambiguity as to the vehicle's movement. All evidential records are automatically encrypted at the outstation and sent to the in-station for penalty charge notice processing.

Project:

Bus lane enforcement, Reading Borough Council

Cost:

Approximately US$75,000 (based on supply of LaneHawk system)*

ROI:

Three months (based on 24 violations per day)*

Summary of benefits:

Increased violation capture rate

Significantly reduced appeals, administrative costs and resources

Improved bus journey time

Congestion-free bus lanes

Less disruption to bus timetable

Simplified back office operation and integration

*Siemens Mobility, Traffic Solutions estimates
The LaneHawk evidential records interface easily with Reading Borough Council's existing notice processing back office facilities, providing a high-performance unattended solution that is simple, quick and efficient.

Benefit analysis

Since LaneHawk was installed in July 2009, the new technology has captured more offences than existing CCTV enforcement systems - on average 24 offences per weekday. The system's higher-quality images and evidential records have significantly reduced appeals, administrative costs and resources. There has also been a subsequent positive impact on bus journey times: bus lanes are free of congestion, allowing them to run more effectively to timetable.

A key feature of the system is how it reduces the number of motorist appeals. All Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) include Reading Borough Council's web address and a PCN identification number. This provides motorists access to the LaneHawk video evidence of their offence. The result is an extremely low appeal ratio compared to other systems.

The system also enables simplified back office operation and integration since LaneHawk violation data interfaces with Reading Borough Council's existing enforcement back office notice processing facility, Imperial. Additionally, the LaneHawk review station is used to process offences from Reading Borough Council's attended enforcement systems.

Since the installation of LaneHawk, far more bus lane violations have been recorded than with alternative attended CCTV or mobile systems. These systems can struggle with high traffic volumes and vehicles travelling too close to each other. LaneHawk's advanced high-resolution camera technology eliminates this problem.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • How typical?
    July 30, 2012
    Deployment of solar-powered LED road studs has provided significant cost benefits whilst reducing KSIs on notorious routes in South Africa. Can these results be replicated in other regions of the world and on less notorious stretches of road? According to Kevin Adams, Astucia's CEO, they can.
  • ANPR integrity is as important as capability
    February 1, 2012
    Increasing the capability of automatic number plate recognition should go hand-in-hand with efforts to ensure number plates' integrity, says the ESVA's Viv Nicholas. Before we apply increasingly sophisticated technology to Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR), says the European Secure Vehicle Alliance's (ESVA's) executive director Viv Nicholas, there is a lot we can do to make the task of vehicle recognition simpler by addressing issues relating to the number plate itself.
  • Adopting universal technology platforms for tolling
    July 16, 2012
    Dave Marples of Technolution argues that the continuing development of tolling-specific onboard equipment is leading us up a blind alley. We should, he says, be looking to realise universal platforms with universal application. The near-future automobile contains information systems of a sophistication to rival a jet airliner of only a few years ago, yet is 'piloted' by a considerably less well-trained individual of highly variable mental and physical capacity, and operated in a hostile, unpredictable and p
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t