Skip to main content

AAA report: caught red-handed

Using published crash statistics, the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety’s report found that 939 people were killed in red-light running crashes in 2017 – a rise of 28% since 2012. Moreover, more than a quarter (28%) of crash deaths at signalised intersections “are the result of a driver running through a red light”.
By 2 mins February 17, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
© Ilkin Guliyev | Dreamstime.com

In terms of individual US states, Arizona has the highest rate of red-light running fatalities per capita, while New Hampshire has the lowest rate. In all, 46% of those killed were passengers or people in other vehicles and more than 5% were pedestrians or cyclists. Just over 35% of the people who died were the drivers who ran the red light in the first place. “Drivers who decide to run a red light when they could have stopped safely are making a reckless choice that puts other road users in danger,” said Dr. David Yang, executive director of the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. “The data shows that red-light running continues to be a traffic safety challenge. All road safety stakeholders must work together to change behaviour and identify effective countermeasures.”

The question of behaviour is an interesting one: in the AAA Foundation’s latest Traffic Safety Culture Index, the vast majority (85%) of drivers said red-light running is “very dangerous”. Yet nearly one in three say they drove through a red light within the past 30 days when they could have stopped safely. The perception of enforcement seems to be a major issue: more than two out of five believe it is “unlikely they’ll be stopped by police” – despite the potential cost in human terms, and given the possible jail sentence that awaits.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) suggests that red-light cameras reduced the fatal red light running crash rate of large cities by 21% - and the rate of all types of fatal crashes at signalised intersections by 14%. “Deaths caused by red-light running are on the rise,” said Jessica Cicchino, IIHS vice president for research. “Cameras increase the odds that violators will get caught, and well-publicised camera programmmes discourage would-be violators from taking those odds. Camera enforcement is a proven way to reduce red-light running and save lives.”

However, such cameras are most successful if used as “part of a comprehensive traffic safety strategy, including engineering and education” and should only be used on roads “with a demonstrated pattern of violations or crashes” under the direct supervision of law enforcement officers.


Safety first

AAA suggests that drivers need to adjust their behaviour in a variety of ways, for instance by lifting their foot off the accelerator and ‘covering the brake’ while entering intersections. The organisation points out that lights which have been green for a long time on approach are more likely to change as drivers arrive at a junction. It advises ‘defensive’ driving too, such as checking left and right even after the light has gone green.

For pedestrians and cyclists, the safety organisation advises waiting until all cars have completely stopped before moving through a junction – and says that headphones should not be worn. It also says that making eye contact will help drivers see you before you cross the road in front of them.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The benefit of Lidar: touch, don’t look
    September 28, 2020
    The benefits of Lidar as a safety device for automobiles rather than as an enabler for AVs are easy to overlook – but Dr Jun Pei of Cepton Technologies tells Adam Hill why that would be a big mistake
  • ASECAP examines tolling’s trials, tribulations and triumphs
    September 4, 2018
    If you want to get up to speed on the main issues facing the transport sector and tolling companies, ASECAP Study Days event in Ljubljana was a good place to start. Colin Sowman reports (Photographs: Louis David). Increasing populations, ever-higher technical and safety requirements, and electric and hybrid vehicles will provide both challenges and opportunities for tolling companies. The annual Study Days event organised by ASECAP (the European association for tolling companies) examined all of these aspec
  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d
  • Loop detection still has a part in traffic management
    March 2, 2012
    Bob Lees, co-founder of Diamond Consulting Services, on why the loop detector just refuses to go away. The more strident proponents of newer and emergent detection technologies are quick to highlight what they see as the disadvantages, and hence the imminent passing, of the humble inductive loop. The more prosaic will acknowledge that loops continue to have a part to play in traffic management, falling back on the assertion that it is all a question of application. And yet year after year the loop, despite