Skip to main content

AAA report: caught red-handed

Using published crash statistics, the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety’s report found that 939 people were killed in red-light running crashes in 2017 – a rise of 28% since 2012. Moreover, more than a quarter (28%) of crash deaths at signalised intersections “are the result of a driver running through a red light”.
By 2 mins February 17, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
© Ilkin Guliyev | Dreamstime.com

In terms of individual US states, Arizona has the highest rate of red-light running fatalities per capita, while New Hampshire has the lowest rate. In all, 46% of those killed were passengers or people in other vehicles and more than 5% were pedestrians or cyclists. Just over 35% of the people who died were the drivers who ran the red light in the first place. “Drivers who decide to run a red light when they could have stopped safely are making a reckless choice that puts other road users in danger,” said Dr. David Yang, executive director of the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. “The data shows that red-light running continues to be a traffic safety challenge. All road safety stakeholders must work together to change behaviour and identify effective countermeasures.”

The question of behaviour is an interesting one: in the AAA Foundation’s latest Traffic Safety Culture Index, the vast majority (85%) of drivers said red-light running is “very dangerous”. Yet nearly one in three say they drove through a red light within the past 30 days when they could have stopped safely. The perception of enforcement seems to be a major issue: more than two out of five believe it is “unlikely they’ll be stopped by police” – despite the potential cost in human terms, and given the possible jail sentence that awaits.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) suggests that red-light cameras reduced the fatal red light running crash rate of large cities by 21% - and the rate of all types of fatal crashes at signalised intersections by 14%. “Deaths caused by red-light running are on the rise,” said Jessica Cicchino, IIHS vice president for research. “Cameras increase the odds that violators will get caught, and well-publicised camera programmmes discourage would-be violators from taking those odds. Camera enforcement is a proven way to reduce red-light running and save lives.”

However, such cameras are most successful if used as “part of a comprehensive traffic safety strategy, including engineering and education” and should only be used on roads “with a demonstrated pattern of violations or crashes” under the direct supervision of law enforcement officers.


Safety first

AAA suggests that drivers need to adjust their behaviour in a variety of ways, for instance by lifting their foot off the accelerator and ‘covering the brake’ while entering intersections. The organisation points out that lights which have been green for a long time on approach are more likely to change as drivers arrive at a junction. It advises ‘defensive’ driving too, such as checking left and right even after the light has gone green.

For pedestrians and cyclists, the safety organisation advises waiting until all cars have completely stopped before moving through a junction – and says that headphones should not be worn. It also says that making eye contact will help drivers see you before you cross the road in front of them.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Speed cameras yield long-term safety benefits, IIHS study shows
    September 2, 2015
    A speed-camera program in a large community near Washington, DC, has led to long-term changes in driver behaviour and substantial reductions in deaths and injuries, a study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) shows. Automated speed enforcement is gradually becoming more common around the country but remains relatively rare, with only 138 jurisdictions operating such programs as of last month. According to IIHS, if all US communities had speed-camera programs like the one IIHS studied in
  • Section speed enforcements gains global converts
    October 26, 2017
    As the benefits of section speed enforcement are becoming clearer, the technology is gaining converts worldwide. Colin Sowman reports. America’s National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is calling for urgent action from both road authorities and the federal government to combat speeding which has been identified as one of the most common factors in motor vehicle crashes in the United States. This new call follows the publication of a safety study which found that between 2005 through 2014, 31% of all
  • Bike lane enforcement is next stop for Hayden AI
    November 7, 2023
    New solution aims to reduce illegal parking in bike lanes and improve cyclist safety
  • Columbia brings the noise to VRUs
    May 7, 2020
    ‘Twalking’ – the practice of staring at a smartphone screen while walking – may be a matter for wry amusement for the non-addicted, but is potentially hazardous to the phone users. A US research project may have found a solution, finds Alan Dron