Skip to main content

‘White flight’ risks marginalising public transport: Transit survey

There is a race, gender and finance divide in public transit usage during the Covid-19 pandemic.
By Adam Hill May 4, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Inequalities are laid bare by Covid-19 public transport, says Transit (© Dhvstockphoto | Dreamstime.com)

That is the key finding of research by Mobility as a Service app Transit, which found that the millions of essential workers currently on buses and trains in the US are “mostly female, people of colour and poorly paid”.

In a blog post, Transit says app usage has been steady at around 77% lower than usual during the lockdown.

The company conducted a survey of the remaining 23% “to show how public transit was being used during Covid-19”. 

“By better understanding who is riding public transit, we hope we can help agencies and governments make informed choices about transit operations during the pandemic,” the company went on. “Things are changing at warp speed.”

“We expected to see a surge in healthcare workers. What we also saw was a steep drop-off of white (and male) riders. Most of those left riding are women, and people of colour.”

Transit says it had a 50/50 gender split prior to the pandemic – but now 56% of riders are female – a figure which jumps to more than 68% in Philadelphia.

Transit says there has also been what it calls a ‘white flight’ from public transit, with ridership by white people dropping by half. 

“Black and Latino riders now make up the majority of Transit’s users,” it says.

The vast majority of people — 92% — are using public transportation to commute to work, especially in jobs such as grocery stores, bakers and food takeaways.
 
Around 20% of riders work in healthcare – rising to 35% in New York City.

“Without adequate transit service, we risk overcrowding —which puts healthcare workers (and everyone else) at greater risk,” Transit says.

In terms of money, just 5% of riders are ‘high-income workers’, with more than 70% earning less than $50,000 a year.

Transit concludes: “The questions about equity raised by our rider survey are impossible to ignore. Who society deems ‘indispensable’, and who is actually getting paid like they’re ‘indispensable’ could not be more divergent.”

“And the amount of ‘white flight’ risks making public transit more marginalised than it already is. When things settle down, and when more people begin to return to public transit, we’re all going to have to ask ourselves some tough questions about how our transportation dollars are allocated. Our society’s dependence on good public transit has never been so obvious.”

The webinar below goes into greater detail on the figures

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • A more equitable approach to road charging: is the technology there yet?
    September 8, 2023
    Thinking around road user charging, distance-based payments, and even mileage rationing is ever-widening with new concepts and suggestions being aired and brought forward every other week. Yet, as Jorgen Petersen of Systra explains, there are already many solutions in place throughout the world which promote modal shift, reduce traffic and improve air quality…
  • Re-set the clock
    February 27, 2012
    The route of the London to Brighton Veteran Car Run, the world's longest-running motoring event, passes right by the end of the street where I live.
  • MaaS is at the ‘baby steps’ stage – but needs to get up and running soon
    April 16, 2018
    Data sharing between organisations remains a potential problem for Mobility as a Service projects, attendees at February's MaaS Market conference in London were told. Alan Dron listens in on the presentations.
  • Mounting benefits of dynamic tolling project
    January 30, 2012
    Wisconsin's four-year HOT lanes pilot project, launched in May 2008, cost US$18.8 million to construct. Halfway into the project, which uses variably priced, or dynamic, tolling to improve highway efficiency, the benefits are mounting. The problem was obvious, and frustrating, to anyone who ever sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on State Route 167 and watched a lone car whiz by every 20 seconds or so in the carpool lane. But for planners at the Washington State Department of Transportation, the conundrum was