Skip to main content

‘White flight’ risks marginalising public transport: Transit survey

There is a race, gender and finance divide in public transit usage during the Covid-19 pandemic.
By Adam Hill May 4, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Inequalities are laid bare by Covid-19 public transport, says Transit (© Dhvstockphoto | Dreamstime.com)

That is the key finding of research by Mobility as a Service app Transit, which found that the millions of essential workers currently on buses and trains in the US are “mostly female, people of colour and poorly paid”.

In a blog post, Transit says app usage has been steady at around 77% lower than usual during the lockdown.

The company conducted a survey of the remaining 23% “to show how public transit was being used during Covid-19”. 

“By better understanding who is riding public transit, we hope we can help agencies and governments make informed choices about transit operations during the pandemic,” the company went on. “Things are changing at warp speed.”

“We expected to see a surge in healthcare workers. What we also saw was a steep drop-off of white (and male) riders. Most of those left riding are women, and people of colour.”

Transit says it had a 50/50 gender split prior to the pandemic – but now 56% of riders are female – a figure which jumps to more than 68% in Philadelphia.

Transit says there has also been what it calls a ‘white flight’ from public transit, with ridership by white people dropping by half. 

“Black and Latino riders now make up the majority of Transit’s users,” it says.

The vast majority of people — 92% — are using public transportation to commute to work, especially in jobs such as grocery stores, bakers and food takeaways.
 
Around 20% of riders work in healthcare – rising to 35% in New York City.

“Without adequate transit service, we risk overcrowding —which puts healthcare workers (and everyone else) at greater risk,” Transit says.

In terms of money, just 5% of riders are ‘high-income workers’, with more than 70% earning less than $50,000 a year.

Transit concludes: “The questions about equity raised by our rider survey are impossible to ignore. Who society deems ‘indispensable’, and who is actually getting paid like they’re ‘indispensable’ could not be more divergent.”

“And the amount of ‘white flight’ risks making public transit more marginalised than it already is. When things settle down, and when more people begin to return to public transit, we’re all going to have to ask ourselves some tough questions about how our transportation dollars are allocated. Our society’s dependence on good public transit has never been so obvious.”

The webinar below goes into greater detail on the figures

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Jenoptik measures out the future
    June 15, 2022
    The speed of tech changes means Jenoptik is redrawing how it sees itself. Adam Hill catches up with Stefan Traeger and Kevin Chevis at Intertraffic Amsterdam to find out more about ‘extended reality’…
  • Multimodal link-up in Vancouver
    July 2, 2024
    Metro Vancouver sees the value in seamless travel between modes and is pushing ahead with a new pilot designed to make it a reality. David Arminas reports on the RideLink project
  • High-mileage drivers more dismissive value of speed cameras, says survey
    July 27, 2015
    High-mileage drivers are more likely than any other type of road user to think speed cameras have ‘little or no influence’ in reducing the numbers of road casualties in the UK, according to a white paper issued by the Institute of Advanced Motorists’ (IAM) Drive and Survive division. The paper, Speed Cameras – The Views of High Mileage Drivers, also found 28 per cent of high-mileage drivers have a negative view of speed cameras – 10 per cent more than other drivers. It also found that more than half o
  • Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    January 10, 2013
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort