Skip to main content

Transit decisions during demos ‘not easy or obvious’

Protests which can turn into civil unrest create headaches for managers and staff
By Adam Hill June 8, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
Many recent protests have been peaceful but transit agencies have had to react quickly at times (© Richard Gunion | Dreamstime.com)

Transit agencies are faced with difficult decisions over how to schedule services in cities where demonstrations prompted by the death in US police custody of George Floyd are taking place.

Global protests led by campaign group Black Lives Matter, while largely peaceful, have at times erupted into violence.

Over the last 10 days, some urban services have been shut down to preserve the safety of staff – leaving passengers stranded at times.

Jarrett Walker, public transportation consultant and author of Human Transit, writes: "As someone who shares the goals of these protests, let me gently lay out why this is so difficult for transit managers."

"This is not to defend or uphold any particular choices any agency has made. The debate about this is urgent and important. My only point is that it isn’t easy or obvious what transit agencies should have done. It was absolutely not OK that people were stranded, and there needed to be a solution for that, but the actual solution isn’t so obvious."

He points out that bus drivers might not be comfortable "being told to drive into an area where civil unrest is likely and there is some risk of violence".

Likewise, managers might understandably not wish to risk damage to the fleet, "thus making normal service impossible" anyway.

In fast-moving, unpredictable situations it can be near-impossible to predict what will be a 'safe' area for transit from minute to minute.

"These are not obedient events," Walker writes. "They can rove fast and unpredictably. They can even erupt from nothing where they weren’t planned at all."

He also highlights the fact that "good transit networks are all interconnected and interdependent".  

"You can’t just turn off a piece without it having a huge effect on the rest. This is especially true when that piece is downtown, where lots of lines meet or flow through."

Buses are also constricted by their size, making some detours impossible.  

"All this has to be figured out in real time by staff who probably support the demonstrators’ goals, in a situation where they will be attacked for whatever they do," Walker says.

"They’re being criticised for holding back, but they’d also be criticised if the evening news were full of burning buses and injured drivers and passengers."

He draws a parallel with sudden service changes required by Covid-19: "These decisions were made fast by people who might have made better decisions on reflection, and will learn from this experience. But these decisions are hard."

Future planning for civil disturbances needs to "honour the limitations of each agency’s product and not expect the impossible from them, while also creatively addressing the challenges".  

Of the Los Angeles transit agency's decision to reimburse people’s Uber, Lyft, and taxi rides from a demo after transport services were shut down, he asks: "Was that the right thing to do? Right now, give them credit for doing something."

And Walker concludes: "But please, don’t make these emergency decisions sound easy and obvious, because they aren’t."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Free-flow tolling needs classification technology rethink
    February 2, 2012
    The move to all-electronic fee collection should be encouraging tolling authorities to look again at whether their vehicle classification criteria and technologies remain at all appropriate. Bob Lees of Idris Technology writes
  • ITS needs to talk the talk as well as walk the walk
    March 24, 2014
    The US automated enforcement market is in rude health as the number of systems and applications continues to grow and broaden. Jason Barnes reports. Blessed and cursed – arguably, in equal measure – with a constitution which stresses the right to self-expression and determination, the US has had a harder journey than most to the more widespread use of automated traffic enforcement systems. In some cases, opposition to the concept has been extreme – including the murder of a roadside civil enforcement offici
  • Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    January 10, 2013
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort
  • Foundation funds research for informed campaigning
    April 29, 2015
    ITS International talks to Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the transport research and lobbying organisation, the RAC Foundation. It is through the eyes of an economist that Professor Stephen Glaister, emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and director of the RAC Foundation, views current and future transport problems. Having spent 30 years at the London School of Economics and another 10 at Imperial, the move to the RAC Foundation was a radical departure from