Skip to main content

New mobility + public transport = sustainability

Cities can introduce all the clever new mobility solutions they like – but if they are not linked to public transportation they will not be environmentally friendly, according to new research.
By Adam Hill February 25, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Bike-share and ride-share on their own won't create sustainable transport - you need public transit too (© Mconrad85 | Dreamstime.com)

As part of the Mobility and Fuel Strategy of the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure, the two-year study found that options such as car-share and e-scooters can only be part of a sustainable transport eco-system if they are combined with public transit options.

“Our evaluations clearly show that mobility concepts must be considered as a whole in order to achieve significant climate and environmental effects,” said Rimbert Schürmann, director of the study at PTV Transport Consult.

The study - Shift effects and environmental effects of changed mobility concepts in passenger transport – was designed to see how new mobility services will dovetail with conventional modes of transport by 2030 or 2050 and what impact this would have.

“New and enhanced mobility services initially create new options, which means that they increase the mobility of the population overall,” Schürmann continued. “Despite the additional traffic this causes, new mobility offerings can make a contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

This is not enough on its own, however. 

“The best effects occur if more than just the new mobility services are promoted. At the same time, conventional, non-motorised and public transport must be improved and linked to the new mobility offerings, and private vehicles must become less attractive.”

PTV Group, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research and M-Five participated in the study, which looked at two possible future scenarios:

Scenario A looked at ‘cautious mobility change’, where on-demand services will be legally facilitated but transport policy and behaviour will change only moderately in the coming years. 

Scenario B assumed ‘extensive mobility change’, where there is “a holistic, intermodal and thus long-lasting transport policy with targeted promotion of public transport, as well as bicycle and pedestrian traffic”. 

These were examined in areas from the big city to urban and rural locations, including sparsely-populated countryside. 

Using PTV software, the researchers looked at how efficient ride-hailing and on-demand services would be in these areas with vastly differing demand, and what their effects would be on vehicle miles travelled (VMT) and vehicle utilisation.  

In Scenario A, new mobility offerings would account for 5% of transport service in 2030 (and 9% by 2050) - and 11% in Scenario B (rising to 17%).

In Scenario B, the share of private vehicle usage in the urban environment continues to decrease, by nearly 14% by 2030.

In Scenario A, VMT of all means of transport increases by 1.2% by 2030 – but falls by 8% in Scenario B.
CO2 emissions decrease in both scenarios by 2030, by 1.8% in Scenario A and 13% in Scenario B.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Kerb your enthusiasm, warns Passport
    March 4, 2019
    Dynamic kerbside management is crucial if urban authorities are to address increasingly chaotic situations caused by the gig economy and mobility innovation, says Adam Warnes at Passport Demand for the kerbside is growing and changing and it’s no surprise when you consider the recent innovations within the mobility industry. For starters, there are new modes of transport, including ride-shares, electric vehicles (EVs), dockless cycles, last-mile consolidations and autonomous vehicles (AVs). Secondly, the
  • ULEZ: is it the best way to tackle air quality?
    August 31, 2023
    Issues of equity and economics need to considered in London's ultra-clean air zone expansion
  • Enlarged transportation data highlights wider issues
    October 18, 2013
    Todd Litman of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute in Canada makes the case for enlarged and improved transport-related data. Comprehensive, high quality data is useful, or even essential, for many types of decision making and transport is no exception. Planners and researchers can cite countless situations where their understanding of transport problems and their ability to evaluate potential solutions is constrained by inadequate data.
  • Demand management schemes, is there a better way?
    January 31, 2012
    The European Commission is placing too much emphasis on the use of demand management, according to the FIA. Here, Wil Botman, Director-General of the FIA's European Bureau, explains why. Towards the end of last year, the European Bureau of the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) released a statement which criticised the European Commission's (EC's) approach to urban traffic congestion following the adoption of the Action Plan on Urban Mobility. In particular, the FIA voiced concerns over what it