Skip to main content

Most consumers confident using AV service, says TRL

Eight out of 10 people reported high trust in AV system
By Ben Spencer August 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Most participants in London trial were comfortable with AV tech (© Irstone | Dreamstime.com) 

More than 95% of participants rated an autonomous vehicle (AV) commuter service operating on public roads in London as a positive experience, says TRL (Transport Research Laboratory).

TRL says results of the StreetWise initiative were driven by the AV system's ability to keep a safe distance, perceive and manoeuvre safely around obstacles and hazards, drive like a human and manage roundabouts.

The laboratory carried out the initiative with technology firm Five and DirectLine to gain real-world insights on factors that may affect the uptake of AV mobility services. 

Five's AVs transported 110 passengers along a 13-mile return trip in the UK capital. It included shared tramways, cyclists, pedestrians, T-junctions, signalised pedestrian crossings and a variety of vulnerable road users. 

According to TRL's StreetWise Trial: Findings Report, 86% of participants stated the commuter service surpassed their expectations while eight out of ten people reported high trust in the AV system.

Co-founder of Five Stan Boland says: “The experience we gained in building a completely new self-driving system, including sophisticated deep learning perception and planning technologies, required us to build a prototypical cloud-based technology to help develop and test our system to a measurable level ahead of time.”

Boland reveals the company is now commercialising the platform widely to help the industry “build better systems, simultaneously shortening their time to market and enabling the delivery of evidence-based safety arguments”. 

Other findings show participants are willing to pay an average of £5.50 for a shared AV trip of around 6.5 miles.

The willingness to shift to AVs is more likely for specific journey purposes such as commuting, business travel or a range of leisure activities which include a trip to a restaurant in the evening, TRL adds. 

David Hynd, chief scientist at TRL, says: “Moving forwards, it is essential that the wider industry comes together to build on what we have achieved so far, so that we not only learn from our combined findings, but also so we can build the framework whereby we harmonise the standards for a future that includes automated vehicles.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • MaaS Market London: transport revolution
    June 11, 2019
    ITS International’s third MaaS Market conference in London provoked lively discussions about micromobility, AVs, the stupidity of car drivers - and Star Trek. Adam Hill was taking notes…
  • ProPart AV trial crosses the line
    March 25, 2020
    The perceived safety benefits of autonomous vehicles can only be realised with precise positioning. Ben Spencer reports from Sweden on work by a European consortium which aims to use the technology to allow a truck to carry out an automated lane change
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo