Skip to main content

Mind the gap! Maryland introduces bollards on metro platforms

Designed to protect visually impaired people, they are installed at 14 subway stations
By Adam Hill January 4, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
A new control system means the gap between cars will align with the new barriers (image: Maryland Transit Adminstration)

Maryland Transit Administration has begun installing safety bollards at its metro stations to prevent passengers stepping off the platform onto the tracks.

The bright yellow posts will be in place at the agency’s 14 metro subway stations from Owings Mills to Johns Hopkins. 

In line with a new federal safety requirement, they are positioned in front of the gaps between railcars to prevent riders - especially those with visual impairment - from mistaking the gap for a train door opening.

Maryland worked with the National Federation for the Blind, Blind Industries and Services of Maryland and the agency’s Citizens Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee for Accessible Transportation on the project.

Each station will have 10 posts, which the agency says will provide protection whether metro trains are two-, four- or six-cars long.

A new control system allows trains to stop at a precise location in each station so that the gap between cars will align with the new barriers. 

Similar devices have been installed in metro systems in Los Angeles, St. Louis and Pittsburgh.

“Ensuring the safety and security of our passengers remains at the forefront of our mission,” said Maryland Transit Administrator Holly Arnold. “The installation of these bollards aligns with our ongoing commitment to provide safe and accessible transit service for all.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Measuring alertness to avert drowsy driver incidents
    December 21, 2015
    Falling asleep at the wheel is the primary cause in thousands of deaths on American and other roads, with truck drivers the most at-risk group. David Crawford investigates measures to counter drowsy driving.
  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
  • IRD: from the ground up
    September 16, 2021
    IRD is undertaking a comprehensive review of its road safety and monitoring solutions. A series of initiatives is building on the company’s in-pavement expertise, bringing considerable additional value for the customer to the traditional range of products while complementing these with wholly new technologies
  • Via offers night access to Pennsylvania jobs
    May 24, 2021
    Free on-demand service aims to connect 'third-shift' workers to regular transit stops