Skip to main content

Lyft to go all-EV 'by 2030'

Ride-share firm says it has already made rides carbon-neutral through offset programme
By David Arminas June 22, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
In the pink with Lyft (© Lindaparton | Dreamstime.com)

Ride-share provider Lyft, in collaboration with the non-profit Environmental Defense Fund, is aiming to have all of its vehicle electric by 2030.

The shift to 100% electric vehicles (EVs) includes cars in the Express Drive rental car partner programme for ride-share drivers, consumer rental cars, the autonomous vehicle programme and drivers’ personal cars used on the Lyft platform.

Lyft said that in 2018 the company made all rides on the Lyft platform carbon-neutral through its carbon offsets programme.

However, the company noted that it is ending the offset programme “to allow us to focus our efforts on direct decarbonisation through the switch to EVs”.

This means that, although net emissions from cars used on the Lyft platform may increase in the short term, shifting to 100% EVs will lead to dramatically lower emissions over the long term.

According to Lyft, EV battery costs have decreased nearly 90% since 2010 and the company expects that by mid-decade, EVs will be more economical for ride-share.
 
“Now more than ever, we need to work together to create cleaner, healthier, and more equitable communities,” said John Zimmer, co-founder and president, Lyft.

“Success breeds success, and if we do this right, it creates a path for others.  If other ride-share and delivery companies, automakers and rental car companies make this shift, it can be the catalyst for transforming transportation as a whole."

“As we move to repair the Covid-battered global economy, we have a chance to rebuild better and create a cleaner, more prosperous and more equitable future,” said Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense Fund.

Lyft is also joining the EV100 initiative coordinated by The Climate Group, a non-profit group that facilitates networking among governments, agencies and the private sector. It has offices in London, New Delhi and New York.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Uber to implement clean air fee for all London trips
    October 25, 2018
    Uber will introduce a fee of 15p per mile for all trips booked via its app in London to help its drivers purchase an electric vehicle (EV). The surcharge will be introduced in early 2019. Uber says drivers working 40 hours per week for two years could receive around £3,000 of support towards the purchase of an EV. The initiative is part of Uber’s Clean Air Plan in which the company expects to raise more than £200 million in the next few years to support the switch to electric. Uber estimates tha
  • Asecap Days 2023: Data drives the best decisions
    December 22, 2023
    Almost all the data being collected by highway operators is going to waste. But if firms collect and analyse these ‘vast lakes of data’ they can investigate threats, monitor management systems and drive up revenues, delegates were told at Asecap Days 2023. Geoff Hadwick reports
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft