Skip to main content

Lyft boss: ‘There has to be another way of doing things’ 

Adding roads and vehicles is not enough to improve mobility, according to Raj Kapoor, chief strategy officer and head of business at Lyft.
By Ben Spencer February 14, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Source: Lyft

Speaking at this week's Move2020 event in London, Kapoor said: “It doesn’t matter what the city is, there has to be another way of doing things because we cannot keep going on the road that we are. A lot of that problem is that people aren’t sharing a ride right now, so the vast majority of commuters in the US are driving to work alone.”

Kapoor referred to a collaboration between management consultant McKinsey and C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, in which the partners concluded that anything that does not involve owning a car is key. 

“It will cut travel times, lead to less congestion and lower GHG emissions,” he continued. “So it is clear that at a high level there is a solution which is around Transportation as a Service that we're starting to see form.”

Commenting upon learnings from autonomous rides offered by Lyft in Las Vegas, Kapoor claimed people are ready to experience autonomous vehicles. 

“What we saw over those 100,000 rides is that the rating has been very high, so once they get over the fear they felt 100% safe,” he beamed. “Secondly, when asked if they want to repeat, 96% want to ride it again.”

Kapoor also revealed that the safety driver is also now fulfilling an “unexpected role as an ambassador” in explaining to riders how the car sees with cameras, lasers and radar and interpret this information to take action. 

“It's very important that they understand this when they get into the ride. We think live human interaction is going to be important, even if it’s video or audio, but it’s important to have someone to connect to in these early days,” Kapoor concluded. 
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Rethinking urban traffic congestion to put people first
    August 28, 2015
    Following the publication of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute/Inrix report on urban traffic congestion in the US, Robert Puentes, senior fellow with the Brookings Institution’s Metropolitan Policy Program , says that while the focus and themes of the report are largely the same as previous years, big changes are underway in how we study, think about, and address metropolitan traffic congestion. This new, modern approach calls into question whether the endless pursuit of congestion relief makes sense a
  • Loop detection still has a part in traffic management
    March 2, 2012
    Bob Lees, co-founder of Diamond Consulting Services, on why the loop detector just refuses to go away. The more strident proponents of newer and emergent detection technologies are quick to highlight what they see as the disadvantages, and hence the imminent passing, of the humble inductive loop. The more prosaic will acknowledge that loops continue to have a part to play in traffic management, falling back on the assertion that it is all a question of application. And yet year after year the loop, despite
  • How MaaS and AVs can cut Oslo traffic
    June 17, 2019
    A new study shows that on-demand AVs and MaaS together could make a significant difference to traffic in Oslo, Norway – but only if ride-share is involved too If you replace today’s traditional private car ownership with a mixture of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and on-demand autonomous vehicles (AVs) running door-to-door, you could make dramatic cuts in city traffic. That, at least, is the view of researchers from COWI and PTV, who have modelled a variety of future scenarios based on the morning rush h
  • HERMES Study provides guidance for forward ITS thinking in Finland
    August 25, 2016
    Having authored HERMES, a major study for the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communication, Josef Czako talks to ITS International about his findings and lessons for other authorities. When CEOs of major automakers are predicting more change in the next five years than in the past 50, what is the role of national authorities considering the benefits of innovations in ITS?