Skip to main content

LA considers free public transit

Plan to make bus and train travel fareless in LA County to be presented by end of 2020
By Adam Hill October 13, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
No such thing as a free ride? Think again...maybe (© Waltercicchetti | Dreamstime.com)

Thousands of people in Los Angeles County could pay nothing for riding on public transit in future.

A public consultation on whether travel on buses and trains should be free has just ended.

LA Metro, which oversees transportation for 9.6 million people – nearly one-third of California’s population – thinks it could increase transit ridership, reduce road congestion and improve air quality.

Metro CEO Phil Washington said: “LA Metro has a moral obligation to pursue a fareless system and help our region recover from both a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic and the devastating effects of the lack of affordability in the region.”
 
Median household income of Metro riders is relatively low: $17,975 for bus riders and $27,723 for those who travel by rail, according to a Metro customer survey.

Figures from LA County Department of Public Health shows that the Covid-19 mortality rate for “has been significantly higher for Blacks and Latinos and those who are impoverished”.

Metro has operating costs of $1.9 billion.

In the 2019 financial year, which ended before the pandemic, the agency collected $250-$300 million in fares versus - a ratio of fares to costs of around 13%.

“That percentage has been in decline for the past 20 years and is expected to decline further as operating costs rise,” Metro points out.

It insists there are no plans to raise or add to sales taxes to fund the move; instead, Metro says it is going to look at paying for fareless transit via state or federal grants, advertising, sponsorship and “other sources”.

A taskforce will deliver the Fareless System Initiative (FSI) plan to the Metro board of directors by the end of the year.

Washington suggests that fareless transit should be considered “no different than other public programmes funded by the public purse such as firefighting, policing and other public infrastructure that serves as a public right and common good”. 
 

Related Content

  • Peter Norton: ‘We can reintroduce freedom of choice in transportation’
    April 22, 2022
    Funding for transit, cycling and walkability can be politically divisive – so why not bypass politics by letting toll payers themselves choose how a fraction of their toll is spent, asks Peter Norton
  • Traffic Group: ‘Daily commute may never be the same’
    May 22, 2020
    The pandemic has taught us that our ideas about travel might need a rethink - Wes Guckert suggests a few ways in which change is coming
  • Brooklyn eyes Bogota’s BRT system
    June 17, 2016
    David Crawford considers the increased interest in bus rapid transit and looks that the latest trends. Bus rapid transit (BRT) is gaining an increasingly high profile in the US public transport agenda, for two main reasons. One is the potential for ‘trains on wheels’ to save substantially on installation costs as compared with other modes such as underground metros or light-rail transit. Another, highlighted in the case of New York City, is the value of having a rapid surface-based alternative available whe
  • Parsons to upgrade LA Regional Intelligent Transportation System
    October 27, 2016
    US engineering services firm Parsons has been selected by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to modernise the Regional Integration of Intelligent Transportation System (RIITS) to provide near real-time transportation data exchange between more than 125 traffic, transit, emergency services and other agencies to improve transportation in Southern California. Parsons will provide RIITS with operational integration functionality through technologies that will deliver big da