Skip to main content

'Don't go from lockdown to gridlock', warns UITP

Coronavirus offers chance to rethink how we want to move about our cities, suggests report
By Adam Hill July 29, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
If this is the future then we've probably failed (© Pongmoji | Dreamstime.com)

A new report on the effect of disruption to transport services caused by the global pandemic has identified three key obstacles to moving forward.

The Future of Mobility Post-Covid-19, published by management consultancy Arthur D. Little, in collaboration with public transit body UITP, looks at how to "accelerate towards more sustainable, resilient and human-centric urban mobility systems”.

But the barriers to progress - lack of proven ability to be visionary; blurred accountability between government and transport authorities; and lack of personal leadership - threaten to block improvements, the report suggests.

“Together, we must move beyond the management of short-term response and seize a historical and unique opportunity to start over and shape the future of our cities,” said Jérôme Pourbaix, senior director of global growth at UITP. 

“We don’t want to go from lockdown back to gridlock, therefore this is our chance to work together and bring back better mobility to people in our cities.”

The special report is the fourth in a Future of Mobility series which started back in 2011.

The authors engaged with 70 executives from more than 30 organisations worldwide, including transport authorities, mass transit operators, mobility solutions providers and professional bodies.

They found that "not all authorities are equal in their ability and willingness to shape a change of paradigm in the aftermath of the crisis".

While only a minority were what the report calls "non-believers” who did not see the need to radically rethink what they were doing, around half were "stuck in the middle" - wanting change but unsure how to bring it about - while just a few authorities are "progressives” which are committed to the need for change.

The report recommends a number of "game changers" for city governments and authorities to push things forward.

These include developing "a unified long-term mobility vision", planning at a system level, fostering innovation through public/private collaborations on technology and business models, and getting to grips with data.

It also sees Mobility as a Service (MaaS) as an important factor in improving services.

"In the longer term, MaaS certainly has the potential to positively influence mobility patterns and behaviours in a way that will align much better with the uncertain post-Covid environment," the report insists.

However, it also suggests that pandemic disruption will "have a negative impact on the scalability of MaaS development" in the short term as demand for mass transit and shared mobility has collapsed.

But it adds: "In the medium term, MaaS can contribute to increased system resilience through providing more choice of mobility options and ease of use. Trust can also be rebuilt by providing real-time multimodal information."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Ken Leonard talks to ITS International
    August 21, 2014
    Ken Leonard, director of the USDOT’s ITS Joint Program office made time in his schedule during the Helsinki Congress to speak to ITS International. It has been 18 months since Ken Leonard took over as the director of the Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office at the US Department of Transportation. With 30 years of technical experience behind him, to say he is enjoying the challenge would be to put it mildly: “It is incredibly exciting to be working in intelligent transportation systems, th
  • Foundation funds research for informed campaigning
    April 29, 2015
    ITS International talks to Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the transport research and lobbying organisation, the RAC Foundation. It is through the eyes of an economist that Professor Stephen Glaister, emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and director of the RAC Foundation, views current and future transport problems. Having spent 30 years at the London School of Economics and another 10 at Imperial, the move to the RAC Foundation was a radical departure from
  • Cooperative infrastructure systems waiting for the go ahead
    February 3, 2012
    Despite much research and technological promise, progress towards cooperative infrastructure system deployment is still slow. Here, Robert Cone and John Miles take a considered look at how and when it might come about. From a systems engineering viewpoint it looks logical and inevitable that vehicles should be communicating between themselves and with the road infrastructure. But seen from a business viewpoint the case is not proven.
  • Emovis’ 5-step guide to educating drivers on road usage charging
    October 31, 2023
    If people don’t understand the benefits of road usage charging, then it is unlikely to have public support. Scott Jacobs of Emovis outlines ways in which key messages – particularly on fairness - can be put across