Skip to main content

Canadian transport ministers plead for cash

Some cities have stopped charging for transit trips during the pandemic
By David Arminas June 9, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Free rides but few passengers (© Ritaanisimova | Dreamstime.com)

Transport ministers from four of Canada’s wealthiest provinces have co-signed a letter urging the federal government to inject cash into their ailing public transit systems.

The ministers from Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec said their transit systems are facing “an unprecedented financial challenge as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic”.

In the open letter to the ruling Liberal government in Ottawa, the ministers said: “Solving the crisis facing our public transit agencies requires all levels of government to come together."

"We call on the government of Canada to commit to share the cost to ensure transit systems can continue to operate and meet the needs of people across the country.”

The letter made no mention of the amount of money that would be needed.

It is one of many pleas for help by regions and cities for financial aid to support transit systems that have remained operating – but many at reduced service levels – during the crisis.

Social distancing, self-isolation and working from home have meant that the fare-paying public has all but evaporated in many cities. Some larger cities have even stopped charging for trips on specific routes.

Federal and provincial funding for public transportation services and infrastructure development is usually politically sensitive in Canada, given the large distances between many towns in the provinces.

Rural populations can feel aggrieved at having to pay, as they see it, for a light rapid transit system in big cities, given the urban area’s access to a large taxation base – and a transportation system that they will likely never use.

Last month, the mayor of Edmonton in Alberta province said he is pushing "an early panic button" over revenue losses.

Edmonton made travel free on buses and the light rapid transit (LRT) system in March and the result has been a loss of around CAN$10 million per month, said mayor Don Iveson.

Total losses could reach CAN$50 million by September if no financial help is forthcoming from the province or federal government.

Meanwhile, this month Edmonton city councillors voted to go ahead with a CAN$1 billion 4.5km extension to the LRT.

Related Content

  • Leading Finland’s transport revolution
    July 18, 2017
    Anne Berner, Finland’s minister of transport and communications, does not fit the normal political mould. She is not a career politician but a business executive who became a member of parliament in 2015 and has said from the outset that she will only serve one term. Without concerns about being re-elected and a clear view of the future of transport, Berner can concentrate on what needs to be done - tackling some of the more contentious and intransigent subjects. Her name is best known for two major initiat
  • Emissions reductions targets to have major impact on transport
    October 28, 2015
    As bold moves aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions have been introduced in California, David Crawford looks at the ramifications for transportation. California Governor Jerry Brown’s recent dramatic raising of the bar on emissions reduction policy for the state has won him praise from Japan, Australia, Europe and the secretariat of the critical UN conference on climate change being held in Paris in November/December 2015. His April 2015 executive order aimed at bringing emissions to 40% below 1990 lev
  • TransLink trials 'virus-killing' copper on transit
    November 27, 2020
    Vancouver transport network's four-week trial aimed at improving Covid hygiene
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t