Skip to main content

32% of drivers 'very opposed' to car-share

Otonomo report finds large minority don't want 'public transport-style' car mobility
By Adam Hill October 12, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Future of mobility: lots of people want it to look like the present (© BiancoBlue | Dreamstime.com)

While Covid-19 has already changed the way we get about, new research may disappoint those who feel it is likely to see drivers desert their one-person private cars in large numbers.

Although there is a firm belief that cars will be increasingly shared and used in a way similar to the way public transport is used now, it's not something that most people actively want.

Automotive data services platform Otonomo finds that almost half (47%) of car owners think that "the future of mobility will look more like public transport than the one-family, one- or two-car model that prevails today". 

But only 33% say that they want that future - and almost the same proportion (32%) are "very opposed to this idea".

Otonomo's report, Data-Driven Driving: Shifting into Shared Mobility and Autonomous Cars, shows that that Italian car owners were the most passionate about a future in which there is less of a one-person, one-car approach, with  39% saying: “I really want a shift towards this mobility alternative.”

Although not so expressive, 53% of UK car owners believed in the 'public transport-style' future too.

However, Otonomo's research highlighted that European car owners overall "are not yet ready to adopt a public transport-style mobility at the pace the industry is developing it". 

41% of respondents are not interested in sharing their own car, while 38% turn up their nose at the idea of access to a shared car full stop.

Age is a factor: 43% of car owners under the age of 35 have a desire for public-transport mobility versus 31% of their older counterparts - but still "less than half of the under-35 group believe in the mobility vision". 

The report is wide-ranging: on autonomous vehicles (AVs), it found that 38% are willing to ride in one and 60% felt that technology made cars safer.

However, 76% of those consumers who were “somewhat unlikely” or “very unlikely” to ride in an AV said the reason for their reticence was that they did not trust AV technology.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Covid-19 cleared the air: ITS can keep it clean
    July 31, 2020
    Covid-19 has created cleaner air: ITS can help keep it that way – but it’s not going to be straightforward, as Graham Anderson discovers
  • Venkat Sumantran: ‘Smart cities are more hype than reality’
    November 23, 2018
    For all the talk of smart cities, investment in systems lags significantly behind organic expansion in most places. Andrew Stone talks to Venkat Sumantran, who has been looking at how to create a coherent framework which could help authorities answer multiple mobility questions Two megatrends are posing unprecedented challenges to those trying to keep people moving around the world’s urban areas now - and in the years and decades to come. The first is rapid urbanisation. One in six of us lived in urban a
  • US state of the art workzone safety
    January 25, 2012
    The Texas Transportation Institute's Jerry Ullman talks about the state of the art in work zone safety in the US. Work zones are places where, perhaps more than anywhere else on the road network, mobility and safety are strongly linked. Historically, field crews and contractors wanted vehicles in work zones to be moving as slowly as possible, assuming that made conditions the safest for work crews. We are though starting to see a shift in such thinking with the realisation that excessive delays or slow-down
  • Mileage based charging offers secure future for funding
    August 10, 2016
    HNTB’s Matthew Click sets out why a move to mileage-based pricing is inevitable. Infrastructure is the most neglected yet the most critical engine of our society, and our continued indifference could lead to a dystopian future. Our roads, bridges and highways have been largely passed by in the digital age—marginalised in an era when funding is limited and stewardship of physical assets has given way to our preoccupation with technological innovation and data—the stuff of the virtual realm.