Skip to main content

32% of drivers 'very opposed' to car-share

Otonomo report finds large minority don't want 'public transport-style' car mobility
By Adam Hill October 12, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Future of mobility: lots of people want it to look like the present (© BiancoBlue | Dreamstime.com)

While Covid-19 has already changed the way we get about, new research may disappoint those who feel it is likely to see drivers desert their one-person private cars in large numbers.

Although there is a firm belief that cars will be increasingly shared and used in a way similar to the way public transport is used now, it's not something that most people actively want.

Automotive data services platform Otonomo finds that almost half (47%) of car owners think that "the future of mobility will look more like public transport than the one-family, one- or two-car model that prevails today". 

But only 33% say that they want that future - and almost the same proportion (32%) are "very opposed to this idea".

Otonomo's report, Data-Driven Driving: Shifting into Shared Mobility and Autonomous Cars, shows that that Italian car owners were the most passionate about a future in which there is less of a one-person, one-car approach, with  39% saying: “I really want a shift towards this mobility alternative.”

Although not so expressive, 53% of UK car owners believed in the 'public transport-style' future too.

However, Otonomo's research highlighted that European car owners overall "are not yet ready to adopt a public transport-style mobility at the pace the industry is developing it". 

41% of respondents are not interested in sharing their own car, while 38% turn up their nose at the idea of access to a shared car full stop.

Age is a factor: 43% of car owners under the age of 35 have a desire for public-transport mobility versus 31% of their older counterparts - but still "less than half of the under-35 group believe in the mobility vision". 

The report is wide-ranging: on autonomous vehicles (AVs), it found that 38% are willing to ride in one and 60% felt that technology made cars safer.

However, 76% of those consumers who were “somewhat unlikely” or “very unlikely” to ride in an AV said the reason for their reticence was that they did not trust AV technology.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Should it be end of the road for right-turns on red?
    April 10, 2024
    Banning right-hand turns after stopping for a red light is gaining momentum in the US. But the debate continues about whether it will result in fewer incidents between vehicles and alternative mobility users. David Arminas reports
  • Safety fears over driverless and electric cars make majority of UK drivers 'cautious'
    November 17, 2016
    The majority of people in the UK has reservations about new driving concepts such as driverless and electric cars, but believes the popularity of such technologies will surge in the future, according to a new survey carried out by industrial connectors and components distributor Northern Connectors. The survey revealed that almost two-thirds of respondents cited safety issues, such as the driver not being in full control of their vehicle, as a main disadvantage of driverless cars. Almost half are worried
  • AV drivers need help for safe handovers, says RAC
    July 19, 2019
    Drivers will need help preparing for unexpected situations where their autonomous vehicle (AV) hands back control, warns the RAC Foundation. RAC carried out a study in the UK with the Human Factors Research Group at the University of Nottingham on 49 people of varying ages using a driving simulator on a ‘commute-style’ journey for five days in a row. During the trial, the drivers demonstrated significant lateral movement (lane swerving) when control was handed back to them, even after being provided
  • The benefits of Lidar
    March 21, 2022

    While Lidar is gaining ground in the ITS industry, it has not yet reached the level of mass adoption where it shows up frequently in requests for proposals (RFPs) from cities and DoTs.