Skip to main content

32% of drivers 'very opposed' to car-share

Otonomo report finds large minority don't want 'public transport-style' car mobility
By Adam Hill October 12, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Future of mobility: lots of people want it to look like the present (© BiancoBlue | Dreamstime.com)

While Covid-19 has already changed the way we get about, new research may disappoint those who feel it is likely to see drivers desert their one-person private cars in large numbers.

Although there is a firm belief that cars will be increasingly shared and used in a way similar to the way public transport is used now, it's not something that most people actively want.

Automotive data services platform Otonomo finds that almost half (47%) of car owners think that "the future of mobility will look more like public transport than the one-family, one- or two-car model that prevails today". 

But only 33% say that they want that future - and almost the same proportion (32%) are "very opposed to this idea".

Otonomo's report, Data-Driven Driving: Shifting into Shared Mobility and Autonomous Cars, shows that that Italian car owners were the most passionate about a future in which there is less of a one-person, one-car approach, with  39% saying: “I really want a shift towards this mobility alternative.”

Although not so expressive, 53% of UK car owners believed in the 'public transport-style' future too.

However, Otonomo's research highlighted that European car owners overall "are not yet ready to adopt a public transport-style mobility at the pace the industry is developing it". 

41% of respondents are not interested in sharing their own car, while 38% turn up their nose at the idea of access to a shared car full stop.

Age is a factor: 43% of car owners under the age of 35 have a desire for public-transport mobility versus 31% of their older counterparts - but still "less than half of the under-35 group believe in the mobility vision". 

The report is wide-ranging: on autonomous vehicles (AVs), it found that 38% are willing to ride in one and 60% felt that technology made cars safer.

However, 76% of those consumers who were “somewhat unlikely” or “very unlikely” to ride in an AV said the reason for their reticence was that they did not trust AV technology.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cities’ quandary over air quality
    October 20, 2014
    Transportation professionals have always made the safety of drivers, other road users and pedestrians their top priority with congestion and other considerations further down the wish list. Now, however, it is not enough to prevent motorists, cyclists and pedestrians being injured in traffic accidents as it appears transport professionals’ responsibilities must go much wider – to the public in general. The OECD has calculated that road traffic related air pollution kills more than three million people per y
  • WiM eases structural health worries
    February 12, 2024
    Concerns about infrastructure are leading road authorities to consider the importance of Weigh in Motion solutions to monitor the wellbeing of their roads – and particularly bridges – finds Adam Hill
  • New report identifies 21 actions to help states address pedestrian safety
    August 12, 2015
    A new report released today by the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) examines the current pedestrian safety data and research and outlines 21 steps states can take to address pedestrian safety. According to the most recent data, pedestrian deaths remain stubbornly high and have increased 15 per cent since 2009. The most recent full year of data indicates that 4,735 pedestrians died in 2013, which translates to one pedestrian in the US killed every two hours. The report, Everyone Walks Understan
  • UK van drivers drive more carefully in their personal vehicles
    September 13, 2013
    A new study by TomTom indicates that more than a third (39 per cent) of UK van drivers admit to driving more carefully when using their personal vehicle. The research, conducted among light commercial vehicle (LCV) drivers, found 67 per cent of those did so to save money on fuel and vehicle wear and tear and 29 per cent because of the absence of working time pressures.