Skip to main content

'Driver-less' does not mean 'human-less' says new mobility lobby group

ACES Mobility Coalition urges 'incremental approach' to developing AV travel
By Adam Hill October 10, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
Future mobility (© Lakhesis | Dreamstime.com)

A new lobby group dedicated to accelerating the integration of automated, connected, electric, shared-use vehicles in mobility networks across the US has launched. 

The Automated. Connected. Electric. Shared. (ACES) Mobility Coalition, primarily made up of transit agencies, was established "to ensure reforms consider safety, equity, sustainability, and the good-paying jobs associated with an emerging industry".  

Focusing on passenger transport, it will engage federal and state policymakers and regulators "to ensure a comprehensive approach to AV deployment, safety, and job creation".

The ACES Mobility Coalition wants an "incremental approach to autonomous travel", with low-speed AVs on planned routes offering the best chance of customer acceptance.

The new group also says it "stands firm on the principle that driver-less mobility does not mean human-less mobility" and will advocate for "policies that will attract and retain manufacturers of this next-generation technology and the jobs they will create".

Ensuring transportation planners can integrate autonomous, connected, electric, shared vehicles into their networks "will address core transportation concerns related to road safety, connectivity, accessibility, congestion, carbon emissions and noise pollution, which are caused and compounded by having too many cars on the road and not enough viable alternatives for shorter trips".

The founding members are:

•    City of Altamonte Springs, Florida
•    Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA)
•    Houston Metro
•    Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA)
•    Lynx
•    Metra
•    MetroLINK
•    Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA)
•    The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTCNV)
•    Beep

Related Content

  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.
  • Emovis’ 5-step guide to educating drivers on road usage charging
    October 31, 2023
    If people don’t understand the benefits of road usage charging, then it is unlikely to have public support. Scott Jacobs of Emovis outlines ways in which key messages – particularly on fairness - can be put across
  • Building Europe’s roads for driverless age
    June 17, 2022
    Creating smart, co-operative road transport systems that harness the white heat of technology won’t be easy but a new document shows the way – Andrew Stone does some reading…