Skip to main content

Five micromobility operators + 10 recommendations = regulated cities

At least, that's what Dott, Lime, Superpedestrian, Tier and Voi think in new guidance
By Adam Hill March 27, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
Five Get Together on Micromobility

Five micromobility operators of shared e-scooters and e-bikes have published 10 recommendations for cities to better integrate their vehicles onto urban streets.

In an unusual show of unity for the nascent industry, Dott, Lime, Superpedestrian, Tier Mobility, and Voi have collaborated to create the framework.

Among the eye-catching recommendations are that helmets "should be encouraged but not mandatory".

The companies also say riders are more likely to use sidewalks if speed limits are too low (below 20km/h) - so a limit of 20-25km/h "allows for safer riding that aligns with the pace of traffic".

The company CEOs Henri Moissinac (Dott), Wayne Ting (Lime), Assaf Biderman (Superpedestrian), Lawrence Leuschner (Tier) and Fredrik Hjelm (Voi) issued a joint statment: “In a pretty short time, the micromobility industry experienced huge growth, providing the strongest challenge yet to personal car use in cities."

"To ensure ongoing sustainability and global consistency, we combined our expertise to develop recommendations to cities that we believe are best practices for regulating micromobility programmes ," they continued.

“Now that we’ve demonstrated what conditions lead to sustainable services, we’re looking forward to working with city authorities to put these recommendations into action," the statement concludes.

The companies make recommendations on fleet sizes and vendor contract length, and suggest that adding new vehicles to streets should be "directly tied to the operators’ performance keeping city streets tidy and well-maintained". 

Data sharing protocols, vendor fees and selection protocols are also covered, with cities urged to consider reliability, safety, sustainability, and fleet management as the top selection criteria. 

The companies also call for contract terms "long enough for riders to become familiar with a brand’s service and rely on it", along with "contiguous coverage areas so riders are not stopped mid-journey" and also practical parking schemes.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Utah plans road user charging by 2031
    June 30, 2021
    Utah DoT report explores expansion scenarios for alternative to state fuel tax funding
  • Transit’s Covid clean-up operation
    August 24, 2021
    The onset of Covid-19 saw ridership on public transport slump drastically. How will the organisations that provide these essential services persuade customers back on board?
  • A coalition of the willing: iATL
    April 5, 2024
    A living lab on the streets of Georgia, US, is helping to improve traffic safety by real-world deployments of technology. ITS International talks to the founder and some of the partners at the Infrastructure Automotive Technology Laboratory
  • An honest relationship
    July 19, 2012
    Consider this: "the most important reform should be that of speed limits and the criteria by which they are set". And this: "a successful road safety solution reduces casualties and catches few people because offence rates are so low". Both statements come from the article on pages 28-30 of this issue on business models for automated enforcement. Both come from established figures in the field (respectively, Paolo Sodi of Sodi Scientifica and Geoff Collins of Speed Check Services); and both highlight the ya