Skip to main content

Uber drivers are 'workers', say lawmakers

UK Supreme Court decision could disrupt ride-hailing giant's business model in London
By Adam Hill February 22, 2021 Read time: 3 mins
Uber's business model may now be in question - in the UK at least (© Claudiodivizia | Dreamstime.com)

A landmark decision in the UK Supreme Court means that drivers using the Uber app are to be considered 'workers' for employment legislation purposes.

The court upheld a 2016 employment tribunal decision, against which Uber had appealed.

Uber has consistently argued that it simply provides a function as a booking agent, and that drivers are independent contractors who, in effect, work for the customers they carry rather than for Uber.

But the Supreme Court rejects this - and its ruling means that Uber drivers may now have rights such as being paid the national minimum wage and receiving annual paid holiday.

The court said that "the transportation service performed by drivers and offered to passengers through the Uber app is very tightly defined and controlled by Uber".

"Drivers are in a position of subordination and dependency in relation to Uber such that they have little or no ability to improve their economic position through professional or entrepreneurial skill," the judgment continues.

"In practice the only way in which they can increase their earnings is by working longer hours while constantly meeting Uber’s measures of performance."

"The Supreme Court considers that comparisons made by Uber with digital platforms which act as booking agents for hotels and other accommodation and with minicab drivers do not advance its case," it adds.

It also found that drivers must be considered to be working for Uber when they are logged into the app - not just when they are actually driving passengers to their destinations.

Uber UK countered that the decision applied to a "small group of drivers using the Uber app in 2016" and pointed out that the classification of 'workers' is not the same as 'employees'.

"Worker is a UK specific legal classification and a worker is not an employee," the company says. "Employee status was not claimed in the litigation and so this ruling does not find the claimants to be employees."

It argues that the company has made "significant changes to our business and have been guided by drivers every step of the way".

It adds: "Drivers now have full transparency over the price and destination of their trip, and since 2017 there has been no repercussion for rejecting multiple consecutive trips."

"Drivers told us that they wanted protections such as free insurance to cover sickness or injury, but not at the cost of flexibility," the company continues.

"They want to remain independent, accessing flexible earnings opportunities when they want it, and protection and benefits when they need it. Nearly 90% say that this flexibility is the most important reason they use the Uber app."

Uber says it is launching a nationwide consultation "to seek the views of all active drivers who use our app in the UK" and will share its next steps "over the coming weeks".

In the US, drivers for companies such as Uber and Lyft remain independent contractors.

A vote in California approving Proposition 22 last November allowed gig economy companies to be exempt from new employment law.

However, a number of US states are considering legislation around regulating ride-hailing and other gig economy jobs.
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Gig economy drivers and riders at increased risk of collisions, warns UCL
    September 3, 2018
    Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study. The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road. The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not
  • Growth of legislation in favour of US enforcement market
    February 1, 2012
    The automated road safety enforcement industry in the United States had a very robust 2010. The industry continued to grow to the point that providers now have nearly 5,000 cameras deployed in 25 of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, with more than 650 communities utilising such life-saving technology. Intersection safety cameras are the most common application but more communities are also implementing road safety camera programmes to deter excessive speeding. Deploying cameras to protect children
  • TISPOL says gig economy tears up enforcement rulebook
    March 4, 2019
    The road safety enforcement sector is facing a crisis. Rulebooks around the world are going to have to change as our roads become a high-pressure workplace for millions of gig economy workers. Geoff Hadwick reports from the TISPOL conference Traffic police forces everywhere will need a fresh approach to regulating the way in which our highways are being used, senior enforcement officers were told at the latest TISPOL European Traffic Police Network annual conference. The World Health Organisation puts it
  • CDC issues guidance for transit reopening
    May 29, 2020
    Social distancing of six feet 'where possible' is at the heart of new transit reopening advice