Skip to main content

Detection and monitoring in Australia with Beam and Drover AI

Companies team up to improve rider behaviour on e-scooters by using technology
By Adam Hill September 6, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
Trial will see what impact tech has on rider compliance (image: Beam)

Micromobility company Beam has partnered with Drover AI to bring footpath detection and speed limiting technology to the Australian state of Victoria.

A fleet of 150 e-scooters, fitted with Beam’s Pedestrian Shield technology, powered by Drover AI's PathPilot, will operate in the City of Melton.

It means the scooters will be able to detect and correct illegal footpath riding by slowing the rider down, and giving them verbal warnings.

Beam and Drover will utilise a three-group testing approach, "evaluating the effectiveness of differing real-time rider feedback in influencing rider behaviour".

50 e-scooters will be integrated with full Pedestrian Shield technology, featuring both audio alerts and real-time speed adjustments on footpaths, delivering a warning about illegal footpath riding and slowing the e-scooter down.

50 e-scooters will be integrated with partial Pedestrian Shield technology, delivering audio alerts only should the rider attempt to ride on the footpath, but with no speed change.

The final 50 e-scooters will serve as the control group, with the technology detecting rider interaction with differing road surfaces but delivering no real-time feedback.

Beam says its standard rider enforcement and education programme will be in place across all 150 e-scooters.

Beam general manager (ANZ) Tom Cooper explains: “Through this trial, we aim to highlight the impact of our advanced rider enforcement technology, and determine the best approach to positively influence rider behaviour when on an e-scooter."

Different states in Australia have different legislation governing micromobility vehicles, but Beam says Pedestrian Shield can be adapted to different riding rules - for example, to enforce lower speeds on footpaths or stop the Beam altogether. 

“The trial will help us understand the best combination of real-time rider prompts and trip intervention to support safe e-scooter use," Cooper adds.

Drover CEO Christian Scheder-Bieschin says: “Helping riders comply with riding and parking regulations makes everyone safer and provides a more orderly programme."

He adds that "granular insights on rider behaviour and infrastructure usage" will be revealed during the deployments of Drover technology.”

The trial aims to gather empirical data showcasing the efficacy of the additional technology in rider education and enforcement, and observe the impact on rider compliance.

Beam and Drover will publish a whitepaper with the results to guide councils and policymakers across Australia in adopting new technologies in upcoming shared micromobility programmes.

The firms say the data will also serve "to inform policymakers on the interaction between micromobility and other road users such as pedestrians and cars, to provide insights into infrastructure improvements that can support the growing number of active transport modalities on the roads".

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Baltimore adds more speed cameras
    July 31, 2025
    US city has been allowed to double enforcement cameras – from two to four
  • SCATS study shows significant savings
    December 16, 2013
    Australian study quantifies the benefits of SCATS to the motorists, the environment and the economy. Opportunity weekday cost savings potential of some AUD16 million (US$15.2 million) has emerged from rigorous analysis of a one-day study of Australia’s Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) in operation. This represents 27% of the total cost of a real alternative semi-adaptive traffic control. The estimated indicative annual weekday-based value is AUD3,900 million (US$3,705 million) or 0.9% of t
  • New legal basis brings EU wide cross border enforcement
    February 25, 2015
    Pan-EU enforcement is set to become a reality after legislation is revised. In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled that European Directive 2011/82/EU, which came into force in November 2013 to facilitate the exchange of information between member states in relation to eight road traffic offences, had been set up on an incorrect legal basis. The regulations had been introduced under police cooperation rules on the prevention of crime, but the Court decided that the measures in the Directive do not c
  • Monitoring and transparency preserve enforcement's reputation
    July 30, 2012
    What can be done to preserve automated enforcement's reputation in the face of media and public criticism? Here, system manufacturers and suppliers talk about what they think are the most appropriate business models. Recent events in Italy only served to once again to push automated enforcement into the media spotlight. At the heart of the matter were the numerous alleged instances of local authorities and their contract suppliers of enforcement services colluding to illegally shorten amber signal phase tim