Skip to main content

US regulator ‘paves the way for Google’s self-driving car’

A letter to Google, the US federal transport regulator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), appears to pave the way for self-driving cars, but adds the proviso that the rule-making could take some time. Google had requested clarification of a number of provisions in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs) as they apply to Google’s described design for self-driving vehicles (SDVs). “If no human occupant of the vehicle can actually drive the vehicle, it is more reasonable
February 11, 2016 Read time: 4 mins
A letter to Google, the US federal transport regulator, 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), appears to pave the way for self-driving cars, but adds the proviso that the rule-making could take some time.

Google had requested clarification of a number of provisions in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs) as they apply to Google’s described design for self-driving vehicles (SDVs).

“If no human occupant of the vehicle can actually drive the vehicle, it is more reasonable to identify the driver as whatever (as opposed to whoever) is doing the driving,” Paul A. Hemmersbaugh, NHTSA chief counsel said in the letter to Chris Urmson, director of Google’s self-driving car project.  “In this instance, an item of motor vehicle equipment, the SDS, is actually driving the vehicle.”

The NHTSA’s current 49 CFR 571.3 rule defines a driver as “the occupant of a motor vehicle seated immediately behind the steering control system.”

According to Google, its SDVs are fully autonomous motor vehicles, i.e., vehicles whose operations are controlled exclusively by a self-driving system (SDS).  The SDS is an artificial-intelligence driver, which is a computer designed into the motor vehicle itself that controls all aspects of driving by perceiving its environment and responding to it. Google believes that the vehicles have no need for a human driver and has asked the NHTSA for advice on the interpretation of provisions in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs) for the operation of the new cars.

Google's description of its proposed vehicles corresponds to Level 4 Full Self-Driving Automation defined by a May 2013 preliminary policy statement of the NHTSA on automated vehicles, according to Hemmersbaugh.

According to that Statement, a Level 4 vehicle “is designed to perform all safety-critical driving functions and monitor roadway conditions for an entire trip. Such a design anticipates that the driver will provide destination or navigation input, but is not expected to be available for control at any time during the trip. This includes both occupied and unoccupied vehicles. By design, safe operation rests solely on the automated vehicle system.”

“In essence, Google seeks to produce a vehicle that contains L4 automated driving capabilities, and removes conventional driver controls and interfaces (like a steering wheel, throttle pedal, and brake pedal, among many other things),” said Hemmersbaugh.

However, the NHTSA is wrong to say the artificial intelligence guiding an autonomous robot car counts as the driver, Consumer Watchdog said, adding that Google's own test data demonstrates the need for a human driver who can take control when necessary.

"Google says its robot technology failed and handed over control to a human test driver 272 times and the driver was scared enough to take control 69 times," said John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's privacy project director. "The robot cars simply cannot reliably deal with everyday real traffic situations. Without a driver, who do you call when the robots fail?"

Consumer Watchdog reiterated its support for regulations proposed by the California Department of Motor Vehicles covering the general deployment of autonomous robot cars on the state's highways.

"The DMV would require a licensed driver behind the wheel," Simpson noted. "If you really care about the public's safety, that's the only way to go."

Commenting on NHTSA's interpretation that the robot technology can count as a driver, Anthony Foxx, Secretary of Transportation said, "We are taking great care to embrace innovations that can boost safety and improve efficiency on our roadways. Our interpretation that the self-driving computer system of a car could, in fact, be a driver is significant. But the burden remains on self-driving car manufacturers to prove that their vehicles meet rigorous federal safety standards."

Related Content

  • May 31, 2013
    Driverless vehicles will cause changes in society
    Paul Godsmark gives his views on what the advent of autonomous vehicles would mean for the wider society. Further to your article ‘Driver not required…’ in the Jan/Feb edition of ITS International which gave some great background to autonomous road vehicle (ARVs), I feel that the bigger picture is needed to aid understanding. There is a ‘technology freight train’ heading our way that is going to transform our roadways but we don’t seem to be aware of it and, therefore, are in no hurry to react.
  • July 14, 2020
    UN regs for safe Level 3 lane-keeping agreed
    Strict requirements adopted for driver-assist in passenger cars
  • August 20, 2019
    Aptiv: we need overhaul of AV nervous system
    Autonomous vehicles are changing a lot of things: Aptiv’s Christian Schäfer suggests that we need to look again at traditional approaches to vehicle architecture to find viable options for the future
  • August 23, 2016
    Ohio moving towards self-driving vehicle testing
    Ohio's toll road, a heavily travelled connector between the East Coast and Chicago, is moving closer to allowing the testing of self-driving vehicles. Testing is likely to begin within 12 months, and possibly before the end of the year, the Ohio Turnpike's executive director, Randy Cole, told the Associated Press. Officials overseeing the roadway have spent more than a year looking at the possibilities, he said. Ohio is among several states competing to play a role in the testing and research of auton