Skip to main content

UN regs for safe Level 3 lane-keeping agreed

Strict requirements adopted for driver-assist in passenger cars
By David Arminas July 14, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
Safe keeping: automated lane-keeping systems get international acceptance (© Izabog | Dreamstime.com)

Around 60 countries have adopted the United Nations regulation on automated lane-keeping systems for the introduction of automated vehicles in certain traffic environments.

The UN regulation establishes strict requirements for automated lane-keeping systems for passenger cars which, once activated, are in primary control of the vehicle, according to Unece – the UN Economic Commission for Europe.

However, the driver can override such systems and can be requested by the system to intervene at any moment.

The regulation was recently adopted by the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations, hosted by Unece. The forum is defines technical requirements applied by the automotive sector worldwide.

This is the first binding international regulation on Level 3 vehicle automation and comes into force in January 2021.

Automated lane-keeping systems can be activated under certain conditions on roads where pedestrians and cyclists are prohibited and which, by design, have a physical separation that divides the opposite moving traffic.

In its current form, the regulation limits the operational speed of lane keeping systems to a maximum of 60km/h.

The European Commission, which contributed to its development along with Canada and Japan, will apply the regulation in January 2021. Japan, which co-led the drafting of the regulation with Germany, will also apply it.

The rule requires that on-board displays used by the driver for activities other than driving when the lane-keeping system is activated shall be automatically suspended as soon as the system issues a transition demand. This could happen in advance of the end of an authorised road section.

The regulation also lays down requirements on how the driving task shall be safely handed back by the lane-keeping system to the driver. Included is the capability for the vehicle to come to a stop in case the driver does not reply appropriately.

The regulation defines safety requirements for emergency manoeuvres in case of an imminent collision - and under what conditions the system will ask the driver to take back control.

Also defined are minimum risk manoeuvres. When the driver does not respond to a transition demand, in all situations the system shall minimise risks to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users.

The regulation includes the obligation for car manufacturers to introduce driver availability recognition systems. These control both the driver’s presence, on the driver’s seats with seat belt fastened, and the driver’s availability to take back control.

It also introduces the obligation to equip the vehicle with a black box – officially called a Data Storage System for Automated Driving (DSSAD) - to record when the lane keeping system is activated.

The regulation sets out performance-based requirements to be met by car manufacturers before vehicles having automated lane keeping systems can be sold.

The regulation text is available as a free download.

Related Content

  • January 11, 2017
    Kapsch outlines tolling options to combat traffic congestion
    Michael Maitland from Kapsch TrafficCom looks at how the various forms of tolling can help authorities combat traffic congestion and air quality problems while simultaneously raising revenue.
  • January 26, 2017
    Call for targeted safety measures to prevent road deaths among young drivers
    Zero tolerance on drink driving, additional hazard perception training and graduated forms of licensing should become the norm to help tackle the risks faced by young drivers and motorcycle riders in Europe, according to the YEARS report (Young Europeans Acting for Road Safety. More than 3,800 young people (aged 18-24) are killed each year on EU roads – the biggest single cause of death for this age group. A report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) and the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council
  • April 1, 2019
    C-ITS in the EU: ‘A little tribal’
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong here are furrowed brows in Brussels and Strasbourg as European Union legislators begin to consider the rules which will underpin future services such as connected vehicles. The idea is to create a regulatory framework to harmonise cooperative ITS
  • April 1, 2019
    C-ITS in the EU: ‘A little tribal’
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong here are furrowed brows in Brussels and Strasbourg as European Union legislators begin to consider the rules which will underpin future services such as connected vehicles. The idea is to create a regulatory framework to harmonise cooperative ITS