Skip to main content

UK insurers unprepared for driverless vehicles disruption, says KPMG report

The majority of insurers are completely unprepared for the arrival of driverless vehicles, according to a new study from KPMG. Its Autonomous Vehicle Insurer report canvassed the views of senior executives from many of the UK’s largest insurers and brokers on the impact driverless vehicles will have on their business. It found that most of them believe it will take two decades for driverless vehicles to impact the automotive sector. Despite acknowledging that driverless vehicles will touch every a
July 20, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
The majority of insurers are completely unprepared for the arrival of driverless vehicles, according to a new study from 1981 KPMG.
 
Its Autonomous Vehicle Insurer report canvassed the views of senior executives from many of the UK’s largest insurers and brokers on the impact driverless vehicles will have on their business. It found that most of them believe it will take two decades for driverless vehicles to impact the automotive sector.  

Despite acknowledging that driverless vehicles will touch every area of their business model, only one in 10 insurers have developed strategic plans, while four out of 10 said they are not making strategic investments in their business model to prepare for the arrival of this new technology.

Insurers highlighted consumer acceptance and safety standards as issues that need to be resolved before the UK sees mass adoption of driverless vehicles.

However, once this technology becomes mainstream the majority of insurers (89 per cent) believe that claims frequency and severity will decrease as a result.  
 
Murray Raisbeck, insurance partner at KPMG, said: “We are surprised that many insurers have been slow to react to the current technological changes taking place in the automotive sector.  Driverless vehicle technology will radically change the insurance market and in our view disruption will happen faster than most insurers think.”   

Raisbeck added: “Insurers need to overcome their apathy towards driverless vehicles. There are clear opportunities to develop new income streams for those firms that are prepared to step out of the pack and embrace the changes taking place in the sector.    

“Firms should model a range of scenarios around the impact autonomous vehicles will have on the market and their own business.  This will help them to identify the products that will resonate with their customers and to establish how and when these products can be developed."

Related Content

  • February 2, 2012
    Need for balance on UK speed enforcement funding cuts
    Trevor Ellis, Chairman of the ITS UK Enforcement Interest Group, considers the implications of the UK Government's decision to withdraw funding for road safety camera partnerships
  • January 30, 2012
    In-vehicle systems as enforcement enablers?
    From an enforcement perspective at least, Toyota's recent recalls over problems with accelerator pedal assemblies had a positive outcome in that for the first time a major motor manufacturer outside of the US acknowledged publicly what many have known or suspected for quite a while: that the capability exists within certain car companies to extract data from a vehicle onboard unit which can be used to help ascertain, if not prove outright, just what was happening in the vital seconds up to an accident or cr
  • June 9, 2015
    Mobility itself is moving says cubic
    Cubic’s Chris Bax looks at the challenges and benefits of implementing transport as a service. Imagine paying for travel in exactly the same way you buy your phone service. For example, you would pay a set amount in exchange for a monthly travel package covering up to 100km of free taxi journeys in your home city (including a guaranteed 15 minute pickup) and public transport usage within a 1,500km radius of your home. Not only would this option be cheaper than owning and maintaining your own car, you would
  • May 29, 2013
    ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen