Skip to main content

Transport MEPs call for boost in development of transport infrastructure

Improvements in maximising the use of EU funding are needed to reduce disparities in infrastructure development between Central and Eastern Europe and the rest of the EU, MEPs say in an own-initiative report voted in the Transport and Tourism committee on Monday. EU member states and the European Commission should focus on completing the TEN-T corridors, bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks and improve connections between different modes of transport. To date, most of the transport infrastructure
September 30, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Improvements in maximising the use of EU funding are needed to reduce disparities in infrastructure development between Central and Eastern Europe and the rest of the EU, MEPs say in an own-initiative report voted in the Transport and Tourism committee on Monday. EU member states and the European Commission should focus on completing the TEN-T corridors, bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks and improve connections between different modes of transport.

To date, most of the transport infrastructure projects planned to be financed by European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) are found in Western Europe and use of EU funds has not been maximised, transport MEPs note in the report on improving the connection and accessibility of the transport infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), adopted with 28 votes in favour, four against and two abstentions.

Capacity building and technical assistance is needed and the Commission should encourage investors to support project platforms to focus on CEE transport infrastructure projects, they say, adding that member states and the Commission should ensure synergies of EU funding instruments to improve their use in infrastructure projects in CEE.

The report says joining up the trans-European transport (TEN-T) network is an important basis for the economic growth of regional centres and development of cross-border road and rail connections and removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links is essential, stressing that use of EU funds must reflect the real investment needs for completing the TEN-T core network.

Transport MEPs are also calling for improvements in connections between different transport modes, including inland waterways, ports and airports, as well as modernisation of existing road and rail infrastructure and investment in cross-border rail networks.

Related Content

  • IBM helping to transform Zhenjiang's transport system
    March 22, 2012
    IBM and the City of Zhenjiang, China, have announced that IBM is helping to transform the city's public transportation system. Zhenjiang will use hardware, software, services and technologies from the company’s research labs, all brought together through the IBM intelligent operations centre (IOC) for smarter cities, a solution that will serve as the central point of command for the city.
  • IBTTA summit hits right notes in Salzburg
    December 5, 2018
    In the birthplace of Mozart, Colin Sowman found that delegates at the IBTTA’s inaugural World Tolling Summit were playing a variety of interesting tunes The first World Tolling Summit took place in Salzburg, Austria this autumn. Created and organised by the International Bridge Tolling and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), the event was supported by its European counterpart Asecap and hosted by Austria’s tolling authority, Asfinag. The transfer of views, experience and practice both ways across the Atl
  • European Parliament test drives fuel cell vehicles
    October 29, 2012
    The 5th Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Drive ‘n’ Ride event was recently held in Strasbourg, France, under the patronage of Brian Simpson, Member of the European Parliament (MEP) and chair of the European Parliament’s transport and tourism committee, to demonstrate the readiness of fuel cells and hydrogen as a viable route to zero emission transport in Europe.
  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of