Skip to main content

Transport MEPs call for boost in development of transport infrastructure

Improvements in maximising the use of EU funding are needed to reduce disparities in infrastructure development between Central and Eastern Europe and the rest of the EU, MEPs say in an own-initiative report voted in the Transport and Tourism committee on Monday. EU member states and the European Commission should focus on completing the TEN-T corridors, bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks and improve connections between different modes of transport. To date, most of the transport infrastructure
September 30, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Improvements in maximising the use of EU funding are needed to reduce disparities in infrastructure development between Central and Eastern Europe and the rest of the EU, MEPs say in an own-initiative report voted in the Transport and Tourism committee on Monday. EU member states and the European Commission should focus on completing the TEN-T corridors, bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks and improve connections between different modes of transport.

To date, most of the transport infrastructure projects planned to be financed by European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) are found in Western Europe and use of EU funds has not been maximised, transport MEPs note in the report on improving the connection and accessibility of the transport infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), adopted with 28 votes in favour, four against and two abstentions.

Capacity building and technical assistance is needed and the Commission should encourage investors to support project platforms to focus on CEE transport infrastructure projects, they say, adding that member states and the Commission should ensure synergies of EU funding instruments to improve their use in infrastructure projects in CEE.

The report says joining up the trans-European transport (TEN-T) network is an important basis for the economic growth of regional centres and development of cross-border road and rail connections and removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links is essential, stressing that use of EU funds must reflect the real investment needs for completing the TEN-T core network.

Transport MEPs are also calling for improvements in connections between different transport modes, including inland waterways, ports and airports, as well as modernisation of existing road and rail infrastructure and investment in cross-border rail networks.

Related Content

  • September 5, 2024
    All around the world: #ITSDubai2024
    The bosses of the three major international ITS organisations – ITS America, Ertico and ITS Asia-Pacific – have put their heads together on a podcast. Beate Kubitz listens in…
  • July 5, 2017
    Transport strategy must deliver fully, says FTA
    UK transport trade body the Freight Transport Association (FTA) says the Government’s new transport investment plan is good news for the sector but more investment is needed to upgrade the road network.
  • May 16, 2016
    Project CROCODILE wins award for smart use of data
    Project CROCODILE, which was launched in 2013 to establish a trans-national data exchange infrastructure to end breakdown of cross-border traffic has won the 2016 Transport Achievement Award in the freight category. The prize is awarded by the International Transport Forum (ITF), a Paris-based intergovernmental organisation and policy think tank with 57 member countries. The project is co-financed by the European Union’s TEN-T programme and aimed to establish a framework to collect and exchange data for
  • May 18, 2012
    EU transport committee votes for cross-border enforcement of traffic offences
    Motorists who speed, ignore red lights or drink and drive when in a European country other than their own will be brought to book more easily, thanks to closer cooperation between European police forces and EU-wide enforcement of traffic rules, under plans approved yesterday by the European Parliament's transport committee. However, the UK and Ireland decided not to opt in to the system, while Denmark is entitled to opt out because the Council changed the legal basis of the directive from "transport" to "po