Skip to main content

Study reveals major concerns over the security of connected cars

New research has revealed that half of British drivers (49 per cent) are concerned about the safety of the connected car, with automotive manufacturers also admitting there could be a security lag of up to three years before systems catch up with cyber threats. The report, commissioned by Veracode and carried out by the International Data Corporation (IDC), revealed half of drivers are concerned about the security of driver-aid applications, such as adaptive cruise control, self-parking, and collision av
March 2, 2016 Read time: 4 mins
New research has revealed that half of British drivers (49 per cent) are concerned about the safety of the connected car, with automotive manufacturers also admitting there could be a security lag of up to three years before systems catch up with cyber threats.

The report, commissioned by Veracode and carried out by the International Data Corporation (IDC), revealed half of drivers are concerned about the security of driver-aid applications, such as adaptive cruise control, self-parking, and collision avoidance systems, reflecting an equal level of concern with the safety of the entire vehicle.

As the ability for drivers to download applications to navigate, park, communicate, conserve fuel, self-park or other driver enhancements will revolutionise the automotive sector, IDC projects the total market for automotive-related internet of things in 2016 is worth $140.3 billion.

Yet exposing a car to the internet makes it vulnerable to cyber attacks which could render the car unstable or dangerous, such as the 2015 demonstration where a Jeep Cherokee was totally taken over by security researches while driving at more than 70 mph on a US freeway. The security implications impact vehicle manufacturers, component manufacturers as well as independent software vendors (ISVs), all of whom are racing to keep up with driver demand.

As applications continue to drive greater functionality across connected devices, concerns over safety and cyber security become paramount for manufacturers. The research highlights several cyber security approaches being taken by manufacturers to reduce risk across a number of application-driven connected car systems, including performance, dashboard and smartphone connectivity, as well as driver aids.

Combining driver sentiment with in-depth interviews from organisations such as 1674 Fiat-1958 Chrysler, Seat, 570 Scania, 7207 Delphi and German industry body ADAC, the paper sheds light on key questions, such as: What are the cyber security implications of the connected car? Who is responsible for ensuring the applications are secure? Where does product liability lie? What are the issues and approaches for personal data and privacy?

Key findings include: Driver downloaded applications pose a security challenge - all manufacturers interviewed reported concerns around the security of critical systems being exposed to applications they did not develop, creating situations where the safety of the vehicle would leave the control of the manufacturer; Manufacturers should be liable for safety of the connected car - 87 per cent of drivers polled believe all aspects of safety, including resiliency of applications to cyber attacks, rests with manufacturers, regardless of whether an in-car application was developed by a software company or the car manufacturers themselves;  Manufacturers do not feel they need to worry about driver data privacy. However, 46 percent of drivers are concerned about this issue, particularly as applications continue to integrate. For example, as navigation system evolve to find, reserve and pay for parking automatically, the potential for leaking credit card information and other personal data arises.

According to Chris Wysopal, CTO, Veracode, “Exposing a car to the internet makes it vulnerable to cyber attack due to poorly written software, which could render the car unstable or dangerous. Building a secure application development programme is a significant challenge for manufacturers, which is compounded by the need to do so under the microscope of government-regulated safety standards and liability concerns.”

Duncan Brown, research director, European Security Practice, IDC said that manufacturers cannot afford to be complacent when it comes to application and overall system security within vehicles. “The positive implication from our research is that the market for downloadable applications is large, spanning the entire market of drivers of all ages and genders. Manufacturers should increase their focus on how to secure applications that enhance car functionality, such as the many driving aids currently being developed.”

“Cybercrime is increasing at an alarming rate.  It is essential that public safety is uppermost in the minds of innovators and that risk is reduced to the minimum level possible,” former Defence Secretary Dr Liam Fox MP added.

Related Content

  • April 27, 2015
    Rail signalling system ‘could be liable to hacking’
    A new rail signalling system to be installed across the UK could be liable to hacking, a government adviser has warned. Professor David Stupples told the BBC that the European Rail Traffic Management system (ERTMS) could be exposed to malicious software, or malware, and used to cause an accident perhaps telling the system the train is slowing when down when it is speeding up. "However, he said governments aren't complacent."Certain ministers know this is absolutely possible and they are worried about
  • September 22, 2015
    Americans steer away from autonomous parking
    According to a new survey from AAA, nearly 80 per cent of American drivers are confident in their parallel parking abilities and only one-in-four would trust this technology to park their vehicle. Despite this, AAA testing found self-parking technology outperformed unassisted drivers in four key areas. In partnership with the Automobile Club of Southern California's Automotive Research Center, AAA tested self-parking features on five vehicles: a 2015 Lincoln MKC, a 2015 Mercedes-Benz ML400 4Matic, a 2015
  • June 6, 2016
    Securing V2X communications
    Cybersecurity developments are moving fast in the automotive sector, but they’re a significant hurdle for the roll-out of C-ITS applications. Jon Masters reports. In the wake of the high-profile hacking of the Jeep Cherokee and problems like the flaw in the Nissan Leaf’s companion app that could compromise the security of data about recent journeys, initiatives linked to vehicle cybersecurity seem to be moving rapidly.
  • December 4, 2012
    Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t