Skip to main content

Security loopholes found in BMW’s connected drive

On 30 January, security loopholes in BMW vehicles equipped with connected drive technologies were revealed. Believed to affect 2.2 million BMW vehicles worldwide, these flaws in the software allow thieves to unlock doors and track car data through a mobile phone without leaving a trace. The Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) has long advocated for secure, open networks for vehicle connectivity. Vehicle manufacturers have argued that only closed networks can be truly secure. In fact, the loop
January 30, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
On 30 January, security loopholes in 1731 BMW vehicles equipped with connected drive technologies were revealed. Believed to affect 2.2 million BMW vehicles worldwide, these flaws in the software allow thieves to unlock doors and track car data through a mobile phone without leaving a trace.

The Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) has long advocated for secure, open networks for vehicle connectivity. Vehicle manufacturers have argued that only closed networks can be truly secure. In fact, the loopholes in BMW’s closed, wireless connected car network prove that a closed network is not necessarily secure.

Jacob Bangsgaard, director general of FIA Region I said: “We are concerned about these findings as car owners have been unknowingly at risk of having their vehicle tracked and opened without a single trace. We have always supported strong data protection for consumers, which should be the leading concern as connected vehicles come to market. As has been proven in this example, a closed network does not necessarily result in data security and car owners must be assured that their vehicle data cannot be abused by tracking or theft.”

The gaps in security were discovered as part of a study performed by the German Automobile Club, ADAC, to discover what repair and maintenance data is sent over the BMW network. The functions that were found to be accessible remotely were opening of doors, location of the vehicle, recorded speed data, programming of the emergency call number, and emails. BMW has announced that the security loopholes will be closed by 31 January 2015 by activating encrypted communication with the affected vehicles. This is the first-ever ‘digital recall’; it will not require a workshop call or the replacement of any parts and will be carried out remotely.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Tokyo snaps up lead in transit performance, says Snapper
    October 29, 2024
    Japan's capital tops on-time table using new comparative Mosaiq Global Transit Index
  • Cost Benefit: Utah traffic light scheme pays dividends
    March 15, 2019
    A traffic signal control scheme in Utah is being taken up by other US authorities. David Crawford finds out how the Beehive State is leading the way in DoT and driver savings Growing numbers of US state departments of transportation (DoTs) and their road users are gaining real financial benefits from an advanced approach to traffic signal monitoring recently developed in Utah. Central to the system is its use of automated traffic signal performance measures (ATSPM) technology, brought in to improve th
  • Car to car communications a step closer
    December 14, 2012
    Vehicle manufacturers have targeted 2015 for the first cars to roll off European assembly lines fitted with operational V2X technology. They and their partners in the Car 2 Car Communications Consortium are confident of meeting the target, reports Jon Masters. Around three years from now vehicles should be appearing in showrooms boasting the capability of communicating with each other. Manufacturers will have started fitting the first proprietary car-to-car driver-aid safety devices and deployment of ‘vehic
  • Alcohol interlocks aid drink drive adherence
    October 28, 2016
    The use of alcohol interlocks to prevent drink driving and change driver behaviour is gaining ground around the world but needs greater buy-in from authorities as Colin Sowman discovers. The often repeated mantra says that prevention is better than cure - and none more so than in the case of drink-driving. The introduction of the breathalyser provided an objective indication of alcohol consumption instead of having drivers touch their nose or walk in a straight line. Initially breathalysers were used as a r