Skip to main content

Security loopholes found in BMW’s connected drive

On 30 January, security loopholes in BMW vehicles equipped with connected drive technologies were revealed. Believed to affect 2.2 million BMW vehicles worldwide, these flaws in the software allow thieves to unlock doors and track car data through a mobile phone without leaving a trace. The Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) has long advocated for secure, open networks for vehicle connectivity. Vehicle manufacturers have argued that only closed networks can be truly secure. In fact, the loop
January 30, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
On 30 January, security loopholes in 1731 BMW vehicles equipped with connected drive technologies were revealed. Believed to affect 2.2 million BMW vehicles worldwide, these flaws in the software allow thieves to unlock doors and track car data through a mobile phone without leaving a trace.

The Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) has long advocated for secure, open networks for vehicle connectivity. Vehicle manufacturers have argued that only closed networks can be truly secure. In fact, the loopholes in BMW’s closed, wireless connected car network prove that a closed network is not necessarily secure.

Jacob Bangsgaard, director general of FIA Region I said: “We are concerned about these findings as car owners have been unknowingly at risk of having their vehicle tracked and opened without a single trace. We have always supported strong data protection for consumers, which should be the leading concern as connected vehicles come to market. As has been proven in this example, a closed network does not necessarily result in data security and car owners must be assured that their vehicle data cannot be abused by tracking or theft.”

The gaps in security were discovered as part of a study performed by the German Automobile Club, ADAC, to discover what repair and maintenance data is sent over the BMW network. The functions that were found to be accessible remotely were opening of doors, location of the vehicle, recorded speed data, programming of the emergency call number, and emails. BMW has announced that the security loopholes will be closed by 31 January 2015 by activating encrypted communication with the affected vehicles. This is the first-ever ‘digital recall’; it will not require a workshop call or the replacement of any parts and will be carried out remotely.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Swedish drivers support speed cameras
    March 17, 2014
    In sharp contrast to many other countries drivers in Sweden support speed cameras and the planned expansion of the automated enforcement network. Sweden is embarking on a massive expansion of its speed camera network and is doing so with both a very high level of public acceptance and without its drivers feeling persecuted; a feat the administrations in many other countries would like to emulate. So how did this envious state of affairs come about? Magnus Ferlander director of business development and ma
  • FIA to campaign for the protection of vulnerable road users
    April 1, 2016
    The publication of the European Commission’s 2015 provisional road safety figures leaves no room for complacency, says the FIA, as they show an increase in fatalities compared to the previous year. Even in 2014, there was only a 0.6 per cent reduction and it had been the first year in a long time without a significant reduction. The announcement confirms stagnation for the second consecutive year, which brings the EU further away from the goal of halving road deaths by 2020. Jacob Bangsgaard, FIA Region
  • BMW and Toyota agree mid- to long-term research collaboration
    March 26, 2012
    BMW Group and Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) concerning a mid- to long-term collaboration on next-generation environment-friendly technologies.
  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d