Skip to main content

Scania tests truck platooning

Dutch Infrastructure and Environment Minister Melanie Schultz van Haegen, along with representatives of the European Commission, recently took part in test drive of truck platooning on the A28 in the Netherlands. The convoy consisted of three Scania R500 Streamline trucks; the steering was done by truck drivers, but speed and braking were controlled by the front truck using wi-fi technology. The plan is to have fully self driving trucks in the future. This method of coupled drive, based on adaptive cr
February 11, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
RSS

Dutch Infrastructure and Environment Minister Melanie Schultz van Haegen, along with representatives of the 1690 European Commission, recently took part in test drive of truck platooning on the A28 in the Netherlands.

The convoy consisted of three 570 Scania R500 Streamline trucks; the steering was done by truck drivers, but speed and braking were controlled by the front truck using wi-fi technology. The plan is to have fully self driving trucks in the future.

This method of coupled drive, based on adaptive cruise control, provides significant fuel savings. "With two second gap it is possible to save five per cent of diesel per truck. That is significant especially when you consider that fuel costs are 27 per cent of the total cost of transport." suggested Lars- Gunnar Hedström, head of product development at Scania. According to Hedstrom, another advantage of platooning is a reduction in traffic congestion. "Because trucks driving close to each other, there may be more cars on the road. The traffic flow is better, with less congestion.”

Dutch laws and regulations will have to be changed to allow full scale testing of self-driving trucks and vehicles, but Minister Schultz was positive about platooning and suggested that the Netherlands should take a leading role. "Self-propelled vehicles offer great opportunities to make our mobility easier, safer and cleaner, it is important that we learn by doing. She called on manufacturers, research institutes and governments to consult with each other to promote the development of self-propelled vehicles in Europe.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Autonomous driving – what can we really expect?
    June 6, 2016
    Dave Marples of Technolution BV looks beyond the hype to the practical implementation of autonomous vehicles. Having looked at the development of this sector for some time, I am concerned about the current state of autonomous driving development as engineering (and marketing) have run way ahead of the wider systemic, and legislative, requirements to support an autonomous future.
  • Report analyses multiple ITS projects to highlight cost and benefits
    March 16, 2015
    Every year in America cost benefit analysis is carried out on dozens of ITS installations and pilot studies and the findings, along with the lessons learned, are entered into the Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) web-based ITS Knowledge Resources database. This database holds more than 1,600 reports and periodically the USDOT reviews the material on file to draw conclusions from this wider body of evidence. It has just published one such review ITS Benefits, Costs, and Lessons Learned: 2014 Update Re
  • ITS America, Global Automakers respond to NHTSA's connected car ANPRM
    August 19, 2014
    ITS America and international motor vehicle manufacturers’ representative the Association of Global Automakers (Global Automakers) have responded to the US Department of Transportation's (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) and a supporting comprehensive research report on vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications technology. The report will include analysis of the Department's research findings in several key areas including technical
  • Moveble barriers improve workzone safety, reduce costs
    January 25, 2012
    Two phases of an arterial reconstruction project in Salt Lake City have provided a compelling cost-based argument for moveable barriers.