Skip to main content

Park assist - Technology may be ready for mass market but user experience is not

Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles. Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics. The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the p
June 5, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles.  Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics.

The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the primary usability issues associated with park assist systems relate to the wide prevalence of unclear and inconsistent human-machine interfaces (HMIs). A relatively new feature, especially to the mid-range market, a number of aspects of these systems are still not standardised.

Derick Viita, report author commented, "At present, each OEM is taking their best bet on how these systems should be labelled, where the HMI should be located, and how it should function. Unfortunately, basic human factor principles were not taken into account in many implementations. For example, a park assist control which is located next to the driver's knee violates control-display compatibility and is unlikely to be discovered; and the use of a cluster for subtle notifications prior to system takeover is also concerning as it encourages the driver to stare at the cluster rather than monitor their surroundings."

Chris Schreiner, director, User Experience Innovation Practice added, "An intuitive HMI and a reliably comfortable and time-saving parking experience are keys to earning trust from consumers.  Our review indicates that while the technology is clearly ready for the mass market, the user experience is not."

Related Content

  • Can drivers be responsible for AV offences?
    January 28, 2022
    Report in UK from two Law Commissions recommends a new Automated Vehicles Act
  • US IntelliDrive cooperative infrastructure programme
    February 2, 2012
    The 'rebranding' of the US's Vehicle-Infrastructure Integration programme as IntelliDrive marks an effort to make the whole undertaking more accessible both in terms of nomenclature and technology. Shelley Row, director of the ITS Joint Program Office within USDOT's Research and Innovative Technology Administration, talks about the changes
  • Road user charging – change the name to change public perceptions
    February 2, 2012
    Jack Opiola explores the oft-underestimated effect that a charging scheme's name can have on public acceptability and ultimate success. The Bard of Avon wrote: "What's in a name?" For transport, especially Road User Charging, that is an especially relevant question.
  • Eurosmart: nearly one billion contactless smartcards shipped in 2013
    November 18, 2013
    The global desire for solutions which combine convenience and security shows absolutely no sign of stopping, according to Eurosmart, the acknowledged voice of the smart security industry Revealing some dramatic figures at the opening of CARTES 2013 today, Eurosmart estimates that 7.2 billion Smart Secure Devices will be shipped by the end of this year, with that number growing by 7% to more 7.7 billion units in 2014.