Skip to main content

Park assist - Technology may be ready for mass market but user experience is not

Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles. Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics. The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the p
June 5, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles.  Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics.

The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the primary usability issues associated with park assist systems relate to the wide prevalence of unclear and inconsistent human-machine interfaces (HMIs). A relatively new feature, especially to the mid-range market, a number of aspects of these systems are still not standardised.

Derick Viita, report author commented, "At present, each OEM is taking their best bet on how these systems should be labelled, where the HMI should be located, and how it should function. Unfortunately, basic human factor principles were not taken into account in many implementations. For example, a park assist control which is located next to the driver's knee violates control-display compatibility and is unlikely to be discovered; and the use of a cluster for subtle notifications prior to system takeover is also concerning as it encourages the driver to stare at the cluster rather than monitor their surroundings."

Chris Schreiner, director, User Experience Innovation Practice added, "An intuitive HMI and a reliably comfortable and time-saving parking experience are keys to earning trust from consumers.  Our review indicates that while the technology is clearly ready for the mass market, the user experience is not."

Related Content

  • Teledyne Flir: here’s how to find the right ITS camera
    January 4, 2022
    From lighting to weather, there are so many elements which need to be taken into account when choosing a camera for ITS operations. Riana Sartori from Teledyne Flir offers a buyer’s guide
  • Videalert: Bath experience highlights joined-up thinking
    August 7, 2019
    Councils can achieve greater value with multi-purpose traffic enforcement and management platforms, says Tim Daniels of Videalert. But UK authorities could also help deliver solutions by committing to ‘joined up thinking’... Joined-up thinking’ used to be a commonly related governmental phrase and implied a commitment to looking at elements of a problem to deliver a holistic solution. However, the way that successive governments have addressed major issues has demonstrated their inability to achieve join
  • Safer roads need safe systems approach, better infrastructure
    January 19, 2012
    Some developed countries are far from leading the way when it comes to making road infrastructure safe. In fact, says the Road Safety Foundation's Joanne Hill, they learn a lot from what is happening in emergent nations. A new report from the Road Safety Foundation, 'Saving Lives, Saving Money - the costs and benefits of achieving safe roads', makes some startling assertions about attitudes to road safety. Although concerned predominantly with the UK, there are some universal lessons to be learned, accordin
  • AV drivers need help for safe handovers, says RAC
    July 19, 2019
    Drivers will need help preparing for unexpected situations where their autonomous vehicle (AV) hands back control, warns the RAC Foundation. RAC carried out a study in the UK with the Human Factors Research Group at the University of Nottingham on 49 people of varying ages using a driving simulator on a ‘commute-style’ journey for five days in a row. During the trial, the drivers demonstrated significant lateral movement (lane swerving) when control was handed back to them, even after being provided